Re: We should drop MathML

Hello everyone! This thread has raised my attention and I would like to share my opinions, maybe as a "school child" who used mathematical software for WYSIWYG editing (not only reading!), as the primary way of editing any math, as a primary/fundamental tool for computer-aided learning. I was

Re: [devtools] Ready to replace the Error Console: the Browser Console landed

Hello! Le 11/04/2013 15:05, ISHIKAWA, Chiaki a écrit : Hi, as TB user, I often find javascript errors in error console when something does not work right. For example, syntax error (rare, but happens during testing), or undefined property error in error console (these are actually rather rout

Re: [devtools] Ready to replace the Error Console: the Browser Console landed

Le 11/04/2013 01:37, Neil a écrit : Mihai Sucan wrote: let console = Cu.import("resource://gre/modules/devtools/Console.jsm", {}).console; Why not just import Console.jsm directly? Good point. I got into that habit because some jsm's export multiple symbols and I only p

Re: [devtools] Ready to replace the Error Console: the Browser Console landed

Hello Joshua! Le 10/04/2013 20:41, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 a écrit : On 4/10/2013 12:05 PM, Mihai Sucan wrote: If anyone has any concerns about us replacing the Error Console, please shout loud and clear! We plan to do the aforementioned steps to replace the Error Console in the current release

[devtools] Ready to replace the Error Console: the Browser Console landed

Hello everyone! Yesterday we landed a couple of changes for the Web Console [1] and we also included the new Browser Console, bug 587757 . [2] To try it please set devtools.chrome.enabled to |true| in about:config. Then you can go to the *W

Re: The state of the Aurora branch

Hello everyone! A summary of the situation: 1. bug 824016 was a known intermittent failure that we believe we fixed in m-c with bug 827083. I did some important changes to how the web console initializes / destroys - changes that we hope allow us to better ensure in our tests that we liste

Re: Firefox debug build and https: sec_error_bad_signature

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:54:35 +0200, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote: On 2012-11-21, at 09:50 , David Dahl wrote: I have also experienced the same problem on ubuntu/clang - probably the same as yours. I downloaded a debug build from ftp.mozilla.org in order to test this with our "official

Re: Firefox debug build and https: sec_error_bad_signature

Thank you for your reply. On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 00:20:37 +0200, Brian Smith wrote: Mihai Sucan wrote: Any https page I try to load shows: Peer's certificate has an invalid signature. Error code: sec_error_bad_signature I can't even run mochitests that load https pages.

Re: Firefox debug build and https: sec_error_bad_signature

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 04:17:35 +0200, Anthony Jones wrote: I've seen this problem when building with Clang 2.9 on Linux but it seems to work fine with 3.0. Thanks! Good thing to check. I use clang 3.0: $ clang -v Ubuntu clang version 3.0-6ubuntu3 (tags/RELEASE_30/final) (based on LLVM 3.0)

Re: Firefox debug build and https: sec_error_bad_signature

On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 03:09:33 +0200, Justin Dolske wrote: Check you system's date + time? If it's living in 1912 or 2112 all the cert lifetimes will be invalid. (I'm not sure if that's the specific error one gets in that case, though.) Thanks for your reply. System date and time is correc

Firefox debug build and https: sec_error_bad_signature

Hello! Any https page I try to load shows: Peer's certificate has an invalid signature. Error code: sec_error_bad_signature I can't even run mochitests that load https pages. Internet searches only point me to faulty certificates, to self-signed certs, etc. The issue I am having seems sl