Re: You can now freely mix declarations and statements in all Mozilla C code

2015-09-10 Thread Nicholas Nethercote
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > >> Therefore, 16 years later, you can now mix statements and declarations >> freely in Mozilla C code. > > Note: this does not apply to NSS and NSPR, though those need separate > commit rights, so if you work on them you probably already know

Re: Proposed W3C Charters: Web Platform and Timed Media Working Groups

2015-09-10 Thread L. David Baron
On Tuesday 2015-09-08 17:33 -0700, Tantek Çelik wrote: > Follow-up on this, since we now have two days remaining to respond to these > proposed charters. > > If you still have strong opinions about the proposed Web Platform and Timed > Media Working Groups charters, please reply within 24 hours so

Re: Proposed W3C Charters: Web Platform and Timed Media Working Groups

2015-09-10 Thread Tantek Çelik
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Ms2ger wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 09/10/2015 06:36 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > > If I am the only one that wants to put in a formal objection here, > > then I'll let it go and go with whatever everyone else think we > > should

Re: Proposed W3C Charters: Web Platform and Timed Media Working Groups

2015-09-10 Thread Ms2ger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/10/2015 06:36 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > If I am the only one that wants to put in a formal objection here, > then I'll let it go and go with whatever everyone else think we > should do. > FWIW, I agree with Jonas that this is a terrible idea.

Re: [stats] Counting HTTP/2 domain names

2015-09-10 Thread Justin Dolske
On 9/10/15 4:55 AM, Patrick McManus wrote: no - generally we don't do origin based telemetry for privacy reasons I suppose, if one really wanted to, that this could be approximated on the client side... Have the browser track all the HTTP/2 domains it connects with, and only report the total

Re: Proposed W3C Charters: Web Platform and Timed Media Working Groups

2015-09-10 Thread Jonas Sicking
If I am the only one that wants to put in a formal objection here, then I'll let it go and go with whatever everyone else think we should do. / Jonas On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:22 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > On Tuesday 2015-09-08 23:25 -0700, Jonas Sicking wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:33 PM

Re: Project Candle: an initiative to reduce power consumption

2015-09-10 Thread Terrence Cole
Thanks for spearheading this, Nick! On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Chris Mills wrote: > Nice work Nick - some really good content here. > > I’ve spent a good chunk of today reading through and giving it a copy edit. > > Chris Mills > Senior tech writer || Mozilla > developer.mozilla.org || M

Re: StructuredCloneHelper

2015-09-10 Thread Andrea Marchesini
Yes, absolutely. I'll file a bug for this. On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:11 PM, Bobby Holley wrote: > Awesome, thanks for working to unify this stuff baku! > > Can this stuff be applied to StackScopedClone (used by Cu.cloneInto etc), > which currently does this stuff manually in ExportHelpers.cpp? >

Re: Project Candle: an initiative to reduce power consumption

2015-09-10 Thread Chris Mills
Nice work Nick - some really good content here. I’ve spent a good chunk of today reading through and giving it a copy edit. Chris Mills Senior tech writer || Mozilla developer.mozilla.org || MDN cmi...@mozilla.com || @chrisdavidmills > On 10 Sep 2015, at 02:14, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:

Re: You can now freely mix declarations and statements in all Mozilla C code

2015-09-10 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote: > Hi, > > In C89 you can't mix declarations and statements, i.e. you have to > declare local variables at the top of a block. C99 relaxed this > annoying restriction, but MSVC did not add support for it for a long > time, so with GCC we c

Re: You can now freely mix declarations and statements in all Mozilla C code

2015-09-10 Thread Neil
Nicholas Nethercote wrote: Therefore, 16 years later, you can now mix statements and declarations freely in Mozilla C code. We still have Mozilla C code? -- Warning: May contain traces of nuts. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozi

Re: [stats] Counting HTTP/2 domain names

2015-09-10 Thread Patrick McManus
no - generally we don't do origin based telemetry for privacy reasons On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Karl Dubost wrote: > Hi, > > Do we have a way to evaluate the number of domain names (not HTTP > requests) which are communicating with Firefox using HTTP/2? > > Question triggered by the recent

what is new with Talos - September 2015 edition

2015-09-10 Thread jmaher
The last update was in late July: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.platform/PaJFBtvc3Vg While we have no new tests, I would like to highlight a few changes: * talos now lives in mozilla-central: testing/talos/. Thanks to :parkouss our fearless contributor who tackled this larg