Karuppayya created ZEPPELIN-2687:
Summary: Show more meaningful info in spark UI, for each job
created from paragraph run
Key: ZEPPELIN-2687
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2687
Pr
GitHub user karuppayya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2434
ZEPPELIN-2687: Show code in description section of Spark UI
### What is this PR for?
Show code in description section of Spark UI
### What type of PR is it?
Improvement
Github user karuppayya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2403
@jongyoul CI failure looks to be not relevant.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2434
@karuppayya Thanks for this PR. It is really helpful. Besides this, with
more and more features added we have more and more duplicated code in
`PySparkInterpreter`, `SparkInterpreter`, `SparkSQLInt
Github user karuppayya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2434
@zjffdu +1 on the refactoring.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user tinkoff-dwh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2428
failed test wich load dependencies, it is possible too long or problems
with the network. try restart again
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
rep
GitHub user tinkoff-dwh reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2268
[ZEPPELIN-2403] interpreter property widgets
### What is this PR for?
I spoiled the previous PR #2251
Added widgets (string, text, url, password, url, checkbox) to properties of
Github user tinkoff-dwh closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2268
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2272
LGTM. For the next step, how about introducing `JsonSerializable` and
`JsonDeserializable` as interfaces?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2272
@jongyoul Thanks for the review. Copy my comment above.
```
toJson and fromJson is used in both zeppelin-interpreter and
zeppelin-zengine. I didn't find a proper place to put the common int
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2272
I saw it above. It doesn't reduce the code size but I think it will help
another contributors understand code well. How do you think of it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2272
I am fine to add interface for it. But only `JsonSerializable` can be
added, because `fromJson` is static method. It is some kind of code
convention, should be easy to read and understand.
---
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2418
@zjffdu Agreed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2403
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2309
Missed. I'll merge it now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2309
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
16 matches
Mail list logo