Github user guicaro commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2154
@AhyoungRyu I've been trying to get #2156 working without any luck,
completely my fault in not following the correct flow. I get into all kinds of
merge conflicts even after I switch to the `branc
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2154
After rebasing from master, I restarted 2nd build job several times but it
keeps failed because of timeout.
https://api.travis-ci.org/jobs/212613496/log.txt?deansi=true
```
The job
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2154
@guicaro Not sure how your local git repo status is now, but if you think
you can't make it back to normal status, I would recommend you to remove local
Zeppelin dir and reclone it. When the PR
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2154
@guicaro BTW you don't need to test #2156(base branch: `branch-0.7`)
anymore since I updated this PR(base branch: `master`) as like #2156.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user guicaro commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2154
@AhyoungRyu Thanks so much for your help. Even after starting my local repo
from scratch and fetching from upstream I can't seem to get to #2154 using
`test_zeppelin_pr.py`. Here are some relevant
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2154
@guicaro Really appreciated your time & effort in the weekend. Sadly i have
no idea what could be the reason for your problem with limited information. But
i think we need only to focus on this
Github user dlukyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2135
@Leemoonsoo , is it possible to restart jenkins checks after travis
succeed?
I've never got travis success without restarting travis jobs manually.
https://travis-ci.org/dlukyanov/zeppel
Github user AhyoungRyu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2156
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2154
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2152
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2155
Tested both with & without this patch. It works well now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
GitHub user tinkoff-dwh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2158
[ZEPPELIN-2279] excluded comments from SQL
### What is this PR for?
Exclusion comments (single-, multiline) from queries before execution.
Comments don't need to execute query and someti
Github user tinkoff-dwh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2158
longest job is interrupted because of the limit in travis-ci (50 minutes)
-> CI red
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
sydt created ZEPPELIN-2285:
--
Summary: why zeppelin only create an spark-submit process for
several users logged in?
Key: ZEPPELIN-2285
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2285
Project: Zeppel
GitHub user sravan-s opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2160
[ZEPPELIN-1889] Fill missing values to grouped data
### What is this PR for?
Fix for multiple group in multi-bar chart
If any value is missing under any domain key in stacked multi-b
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2159
@Leemoonsoo Please review and merge it if it's ok.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
GitHub user jongyoul opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2159
[HOTFIX] Handle removing interpreters while removing note
### What is this PR for?
Removing some interpreters while removing note. In case of "Per note",
"Isolated" interpreter process shoul
GitHub user khalidhuseynov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2161
Fix multiuser ws connection for secondary ZeppelinHubRepo storage
### What is this PR for?
This is to fix problem with ws connection that was introduced in 0.7.0 with
`ZeppelinHubRepo`
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2159
Tested and it works perfectly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2155
Merge to master and branch-0.7 as a hotfix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user sravan-s commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2160
Are there any problems in CI?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2085
@tinkoff-dwh Saw your latest update. As you did,
```
## Usage
For example in database exist user `user1` with some password and exists
user with same name into
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2159
Will merge it
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2150
@andreaTP There are some conflict files after #2093 merged. Can you resolve
them?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2159
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2155
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Lee moon soo created ZEPPELIN-2286:
--
Summary: Some test matrix on Travis often exceeds time limits
(50min)
Key: ZEPPELIN-2286
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2286
Project: Zeppeli
GitHub user Leemoonsoo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2162
[ZEPPELIN-2286] Some test matrix on Travis often exceeds time limits (50min)
### What is this PR for?
This PR optimize CI test matrix while keeping the same test coverage.
from
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2145
I agree with @felixcheung.I'm not sure what the benefit is.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Hi dev & users,
Recently, community submits very new features for Apache Zeppelin. I think
it's very positive signals to improve Apache Zeppelin and its community.
But in another aspect, we should focus on what the next release includes. I
think we need to summarize and prioritize them. Here is wh
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2151
I think JobSever is more proper location to handle the job status and
relationship. How do you think of it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2141
@guicaro There are some unrelated commits in here after you rebased. Can
you try to fix it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitH
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2151
@Remilito Thanks for the useful feature.
I think it'll be better to display only essential buttons in the paragraph.
How about placing it under paragraph control dropdown menu instead? I me
Here's some candidates for 0.8 IMO
- Restructing InterpreterFacotry
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2056Although it is
refactoring ticket, I feel it is pretty important thing to do. As I see
many bugs are due to interpreter factory component, and I do feel it needs
Github user tinkoff-dwh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2162
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Ahyoung Ryu created ZEPPELIN-2287:
-
Summary: Add test cases to ensure 'RunOnSelectionChange' works well
Key: ZEPPELIN-2287
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2287
Project: Zeppelin
36 matches
Mail list logo
