Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2145
I think zeppelin should provide a pluggable interface for password storing
and encrypting. Zeppelin could provide its default implementation for that but
allow for extension. Storing password in fi
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2156
@Leemoonsoo Thanks! CI has been passed after rebasing from `branch-0.7`.
Will merge into `branch-0.7` as a hotfix if there are no more comments on
this.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2145
I'm concerned that this would give people a false sense of security...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2157
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2157
CI became green.
I'm merging it to master and branch-0.7 as a hotfix.
Created issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2284 to make
sure remove AngularObject on interpr
Lee moon soo created ZEPPELIN-2284:
--
Summary: Handle angularObjects in angularObjectRegistry on
interpreter restart.
Key: ZEPPELIN-2284
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-2284
Projec
Github user Leemoonsoo closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2157
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user Leemoonsoo reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2157
[HOTFIX] Fix CI
### What is this PR for?
CI is failing since
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/commit/970b8117a48a31a9375bf7f76142117fd9b3bd86
This PR tries to make CI green
Github user 1ambda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2098
updated
Please check https://github.com/1ambda/zeppelin-ultimate-line-chart as well.
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2148
It was merged yesterday but seems wan't closed automatically by asfgit. So
I'm closing this manually now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AhyoungRyu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2148
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2154
FYI, quick show for `edit on double click` with markdown interpreter
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c4c5/3c4c52876d259d96e668d55b49c778f15d531fad" alt="edit on double
click"
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user guicaro commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2154
@AhyoungRyu just glanced through comments in #2156 I also wondered why
changes in check boxes did not trigger a run when placed next to a select form
and with the `Run on selection change` glad to
GitHub user Leemoonsoo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2157
[HOTFIX] Fix CI
### What is this PR for?
CI is failing since
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/commit/970b8117a48a31a9375bf7f76142117fd9b3bd86
This PR tries to make CI green
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2154
@guicaro Thank you for the quick checking!
I made some change in #2156(it's base branch is `branch-0.7` while this PR
was created on `master`) for the checkbox. The every checking the checkb
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2131
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2143
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2154
The error is not related to this change. I'm working on the CI error.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2156
Tested and LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user Remilito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2099
@Leemoonsoo thanks for the feedback, I think we should keep only B. I'll
update the PR in a couple of days.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2156
@Leemoonsoo Yeah it makes sense. So I updated again as you said.
- When two types of dynamic form in the paragraph
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23138/231389250306b529ef7838369892c421676dd4c5" alt="record" Thanks
---
If your project
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2156
@Leemoonsoo You mean the `checkbox` dynamic form? The `Run on selection
change` is only for `select form`.
Do you think this can make user confused?
---
If your project is set up fo
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2156
When "Run on selection change" is checked, check box change does not run
paragraph. @AhyoungRyu can you check?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2141
@guicaro I feel so sorry to you since it was my bad. Just created hotfix
patch #2154 to fix below two issues that you reported.
- Select form is not shown up when multiple dynamic forms (e.
GitHub user Leemoonsoo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2155
[HOTFIX] Dynamic form in python interpreter
### What is this PR for?
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2106 rewrote python interpreter.
But dynamic form feature is not rewritten corr
GitHub user AhyoungRyu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2156
[HOTFOX][Branch-0.7] Fix multi dynamic select forms behaviour
### What is this PR for?
This PR is same with #2154 with base branch `branch-0.7`.
Please refer to #2154's descriptio
GitHub user AhyoungRyu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2154
[HOT FIX][MASTER] Fix multi dynamic select forms behaviour
### What is this PR for?
After #2100 merged, we can control the behaviour of running select form
using `Run on selection change`
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2085
Thanks @tinkoff-dwh for useful new feature.
LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2152
Merge to master and branch-0.7 if no more comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Nowadays, the second and the third profile takes around 40~45min.
Which is very close to limit of travis 50min.
I've seen sometimes second or the third profile just fails because of it
takes longer than usual (by slow network download, etc).
I think we need to split second/third profile so the bu
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2141
@guicaro Thanks for letting me know. Let me check again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user guicaro commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2141
Quick question, what is the behavior when we have more than 2 select forms?
Shouldn't we also have a **"Run on selection"** check box? I believe this was
one of the pain points for some (see
[ZEP
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2106
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user guicaro commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2141
@AhyoungRyu I'm currently looking at why testMultipleDynamicFormsSameType
is failing. It now fails after I rebased from master. It's the test case that
includes two select forms in one single para
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2148
CI failed in two cases with below reason which is irrelevant with this
change.
```
No output has been received in the last 10m0s, this potentially indicates a
stalled build or som
40 matches
Mail list logo