Re: Secmail feature request

2017-06-10 Thread Craig Russell
On Jun 10, 2017, at 6:28 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Craig Russell wrote: >> Hi Sam, >> >> I totally missed this email in the forest. > > It happens :-) > >>> On May 20, 2017, at 7:56 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Craig Russell >

Re: Secmail feature request

2017-06-10 Thread Sam Ruby
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Craig Russell wrote: > Hi Sam, > > I totally missed this email in the forest. It happens :-) >> On May 20, 2017, at 7:56 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Craig Russell >> wrote: >>> On May 15, 2017, at 12:38 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:

Re: Secmail feature request

2017-06-10 Thread Craig Russell
Hi Sam, I totally missed this email in the forest. > On May 20, 2017, at 7:56 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Craig Russell > wrote: >> >>> On May 15, 2017, at 12:38 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Craig Russell >>> wrote: Hi Sa

Re: Secmail feature request

2017-05-20 Thread Sam Ruby
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Craig Russell wrote: > >> On May 15, 2017, at 12:38 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Craig Russell wrote: >>> Hi Sam, >>> On May 13, 2017, at 7:41 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Craig Russell

Re: Secmail feature request

2017-05-15 Thread Craig Russell
> On May 15, 2017, at 12:38 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Craig Russell wrote: >> Hi Sam, >> >>> On May 13, 2017, at 7:41 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Craig Russell wrote: I know up front that this is a second icla. So g

Re: Secmail feature request

2017-05-15 Thread Sam Ruby
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Craig Russell wrote: > Hi Sam, > >> On May 13, 2017, at 7:41 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: >> >> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Craig Russell wrote: >>> >>> I know up front that this is a second icla. So good idea for this to be a >>> different action. >>> (O) icla >>>

Re: Secmail feature request

2017-05-15 Thread Craig Russell
Hi Sam, > On May 13, 2017, at 7:41 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Craig Russell wrote: >> >> I know up front that this is a second icla. So good idea for this to be a >> different action. >> (O) icla >> (O) additional icla >> (O) ccla >> >> Full Name: this is the ke

Re: Secmail feature request

2017-05-13 Thread Sam Ruby
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Craig Russell wrote: > > I know up front that this is a second icla. So good idea for this to be a > different action. > (O) icla > (O) additional icla > (O) ccla > > Full Name: this is the key to find the entry in iclas.txt > Public Name: this should replace the

Re: Secmail feature request

2017-05-12 Thread Craig Russell
Hi Sam, > On May 11, 2017, at 5:41 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Craig Russell wrote: >> If an icla comes in, and the generated name user-name.pdf already exists, a >> warning is raised. >> >> Warning: documents/iclas/craig-russell.pdf already exists >> (proceed any

Re: Secmail feature request

2017-05-11 Thread Sam Ruby
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Craig Russell wrote: > If an icla comes in, and the generated name user-name.pdf already exists, a > warning is raised. > > Warning: documents/iclas/craig-russell.pdf already exists > (proceed anyway) (cancel) > > This is almost good. It prevents filing a new icla

Secmail feature request

2017-05-10 Thread Craig Russell
If an icla comes in, and the generated name user-name.pdf already exists, a warning is raised. Warning: documents/iclas/craig-russell.pdf already exists (proceed anyway) (cancel) This is almost good. It prevents filing a new icla where the icla already exists. [The (cancel) button doesn't work