Re: E_NO_CARE

> On Jun 12, 2022, at 03:08, sebb wrote: > > On Sun, 12 Jun 2022 at 01:49, Craig Russell > wrote: >> >> While looking at the secretary workbench process to reject a document, there >> was at the same time a document that has no relevance to the job of >> secreta

Re: E_NO_CARE

On Sun, 12 Jun 2022 at 01:49, Craig Russell wrote: > > While looking at the secretary workbench process to reject a document, there > was at the same time a document that has no relevance to the job of secretary. > > I'm thinking of adding a new reason to reject a document. > > @not_relevant; '

E_NO_CARE

While looking at the secretary workbench process to reject a document, there was at the same time a document that has no relevance to the job of secretary. I'm thinking of adding a new reason to reject a document. @not_relevant; ' not relevant', ' this document is not relevant to the work of t