On Sun, 12 Jun 2022 at 01:49, Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote: > > While looking at the secretary workbench process to reject a document, there > was at the same time a document that has no relevance to the job of secretary. > > I'm thinking of adding a new reason to reject a document. > > @not_relevant; ' not relevant', ' this document is not relevant to the work > of the Foundation' > > We "often" get documents (like those from Abdulrahman) that we will never > file. As it is, I sometimes just delete it from secretary workbench but > sometimes I feel like I should tell them that it just is not relevant to our > job here. > > Sebbgestions?
Interesting typo ... Easy enough to add that as another failure type. However it's already possible to reply to the email from your own copy, and just delete the email from the workbench. Note that the workbench only shows emails with attachments, so the Secretary still has to deal with other emails locally. > Craig > > Craig L Russell > c...@apache.org >
