On Sun, 8 Aug 2021 at 00:46, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 7:34 PM sebb wrote:
> >
> > The 'rake update' command restarts Passenger apps that have changed
> > since the last update.
> >
> > It then goes on the update the Gems.
>
> ... and my touch restart.txt again.
I'd overlooked t
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 7, 2021, at 4:27 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> On Sun, 8 Aug 2021 at 00:18, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 6:52 PM sebb wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, 7 Aug 2021 at 16:00, Matt Sicker wrote:
I probably added those at one point when I had a bunch of r
I don’t know enough about different versions of ruby to recommend which one to
use. Whatever version we use in production would make sense here.
Matt Sicker
> On Aug 7, 2021, at 18:27, sebb wrote:
>
> On Sun, 8 Aug 2021 at 00:18, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 6:52 PM sebb w
On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 7:34 PM sebb wrote:
>
> The 'rake update' command restarts Passenger apps that have changed
> since the last update.
>
> It then goes on the update the Gems.
... and my touch restart.txt again.
> That seems a bit odd: would it not be better to update the Gems first,
> so a
The 'rake update' command restarts Passenger apps that have changed
since the last update.
It then goes on the update the Gems.
That seems a bit odd: would it not be better to update the Gems first,
so any restarted apps pick up the new Gems?
The task comment says:
'# update gems and restart app
On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 6:12 PM sebb wrote:
>
> On Sat, 7 Aug 2021 at 19:53, sebb wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 7 Aug 2021 at 18:58, Sam Ruby wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 1:10 PM sebb wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, 7 Aug 2021 at 17:42, Sam Ruby wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Aug 7, 20
On Sun, 8 Aug 2021 at 00:18, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 6:52 PM sebb wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 7 Aug 2021 at 16:00, Matt Sicker wrote:
> > >
> > > I probably added those at one point when I had a bunch of ruby versions
> > > installed. I don’t think it’s needed anymore.
> >
> > OK
On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 6:52 PM sebb wrote:
>
> On Sat, 7 Aug 2021 at 16:00, Matt Sicker wrote:
> >
> > I probably added those at one point when I had a bunch of ruby versions
> > installed. I don’t think it’s needed anymore.
>
> OK I can delete the file, but what changes are needed to MACOS.md?
On Sat, 7 Aug 2021 at 16:00, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> I probably added those at one point when I had a bunch of ruby versions
> installed. I don’t think it’s needed anymore.
OK I can delete the file, but what changes are needed to MACOS.md?
> Matt Sicker
>
> > On Aug 7, 2021, at 08:22, sebb wrot
On Sat, 7 Aug 2021 at 19:53, sebb wrote:
>
> On Sat, 7 Aug 2021 at 18:58, Sam Ruby wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 1:10 PM sebb wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 7 Aug 2021 at 17:42, Sam Ruby wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 11:46 AM sebb wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, 7 Aug 20
sebbASF commented on pull request #120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/whimsy/pull/120#issuecomment-894711513
In case it is not obvious, I am -1 on applying this PR without a clear
explanation of the benefit.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
sebbASF commented on pull request #120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/whimsy/pull/120#issuecomment-894711284
You still have not explained how it helps to know the whether the family
name is first or not.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the mess
clr-apache commented on pull request #120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/whimsy/pull/120#issuecomment-894710333
@sebbASF
My interest in this is motivated by over 10 years of experience filing ICLAs
and IMHO adding family first flag to the ICLA and secretary workbench is an
improvement
sebbASF commented on pull request #120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/whimsy/pull/120#issuecomment-894704206
We have already discussed that givenName and sn are not actually used, so it
really does not matter what they are.
givenName is optional to the LDAP schema, so can be omitted
I'd appreciate it if you all could take a look at the changes to secretary
workbench.
If you're on the family-first branch I've been testing using config/setupmymac
and the code works just as I like it to.
Future improvements can include delegating the LDAP sn and givenName to methods
in lib/p
clr-apache commented on pull request #120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/whimsy/pull/120#issuecomment-894702891
The family first flag allows for the ICLA submitter to tell secretary that
the names are culturally consistent. Secretary can then create the file name
consistent with the curre
sebbASF commented on pull request #120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/whimsy/pull/120#issuecomment-894702563
What is the use-case for this, now that the workbench does checks for name
clashes?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
asfgit closed issue #123:
URL: https://github.com/apache/whimsy/issues/123
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@whimsic
dave2wave opened a new issue #123:
URL: https://github.com/apache/whimsy/issues/123
In c0198aa support for resolutionLink and resolutionUrl were added. For some
reason these do not flow through to
https://whimsy.apache.org/public/public_podlings.json
--
This is an automated message from
On Sat, 7 Aug 2021 at 18:58, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 1:10 PM sebb wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 7 Aug 2021 at 17:42, Sam Ruby wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 11:46 AM sebb wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, 7 Aug 2021 at 16:28, Sam Ruby wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The 'gem' li
dave2wave opened a new issue #122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/whimsy/issues/122
Since the apache.org website is now in git there needs to be support for
writing (commit/push) in the git.rb module.
Specifically updating
`https://github.com/apache/www-site/blob/main/content/founda
Good news. Thanks to Sam for working with me to get my local environment back
to where I can usefully test the family-first ICLA. I still have
issues/questions that I'll raise in another thread.
I also will try Sebb's suggestions to import new test ICLAs into my testing
environment.
Thanks,
Cr
On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 1:10 PM sebb wrote:
>
> On Sat, 7 Aug 2021 at 17:42, Sam Ruby wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 11:46 AM sebb wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 7 Aug 2021 at 16:28, Sam Ruby wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The 'gem' lines with path values in Gemfiles are effectively a way to
> > > >
On Sat, 7 Aug 2021 at 17:42, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 11:46 AM sebb wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 7 Aug 2021 at 16:28, Sam Ruby wrote:
> > >
> > > The 'gem' lines with path values in Gemfiles are effectively a way to
> > > add another part of the source tree to the ruby lib path.
> >
On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 11:46 AM sebb wrote:
>
> On Sat, 7 Aug 2021 at 16:28, Sam Ruby wrote:
> >
> > The 'gem' lines with path values in Gemfiles are effectively a way to
> > add another part of the source tree to the ruby lib path.
>
> But is the Gem packaging code still needed for Whimsy?
Inde
On Sat, 7 Aug 2021 at 16:28, Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> The 'gem' lines with path values in Gemfiles are effectively a way to
> add another part of the source tree to the ruby lib path.
But is the Gem packaging code still needed for Whimsy?
I've created a branch to work on this.
It mostly works, but it
The 'gem' lines with path values in Gemfiles are effectively a way to
add another part of the source tree to the ruby lib path.
- Sam Ruby
On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 8:43 AM sebb wrote:
>
> AFAICT it is not necessary for the whimsy library code to be packaged as a
> Gem.
>
> However there is still
I probably added those at one point when I had a bunch of ruby versions
installed. I don’t think it’s needed anymore.
Matt Sicker
> On Aug 7, 2021, at 08:22, sebb wrote:
>
> The file .ruby-version is mentioned in MACOS.md in relation to rbenv.
>
> However the contents are 2.4.1, having previ
The file .ruby-version is mentioned in MACOS.md in relation to rbenv.
However the contents are 2.4.1, having previously been 2.5.5.
Both seem seriously out of date, so it looks like the file is not needed.
Sebb
AFAICT it is not necessary for the whimsy library code to be packaged as a Gem.
However there is still some code relating to the packaging.
This may or may not still work.
I think it would be best to drop the code to reduce the burden on
future maintainers.
Sebb
30 matches
Mail list logo
