@tqchen @manupa-arm @mjs @giuseros great discussions so far!
> Identifiers that begin with underscore are reserved by the C standard.
> Conformant C code should not use them, dropping the _ and using just “tvm_…”
> would be conformant.
I agree with this. Do we need to consider distinguishing
I agree that having a common prefix is helpful in the dso landscape to clearly
identify function generated by tvm. To faciliate discussion, consider the
following code
```python
m = tvm.runtime.load_module("x.so")
# Option P0: require explicit query using tvm_run
run = m["tvm_run"]
# Option P
Identifiers that begin with underscore are reserved by the C standard.
Conformant C code should not use them, dropping the _ and using just "tvm_..."
would be conformant.
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/mini-rfc-name-mangling-in-aot/9907/8)
to respond.
You are recei
Hi @areusch @tqchen @giuseros
I think its best to use _tvm prefix nonetheless. -- so we dont pollute a
namespace based on a user given variable.
I dont follow why a "prefix" necessarily mean user being able to select it? If
"prefix" is not the right term we should not call it a prefix. The g
