Hi @areusch @tqchen @giuseros
I think its best to use _tvm prefix nonetheless. -- so we dont pollute a namespace based on a user given variable. I dont follow why a "prefix" necessarily mean user being able to select it? If "prefix" is not the right term we should not call it a prefix. The goal of this RFC is to propose mechanism to reduce namespace pollution. Therefore having "_tvm" states that this belongs tvm codegen'd artifacts and moreover allowing a model name allows to further categorize artifacts of multiple compilations. Therefore, I'd suggest we use : * _tvm_MYNET_run (lets drop the func :) ) and (if a model name is not given) * _tvm_run @tqchen , I'd assume if a model name is not given the second option would be backward compatible DSOModule loader ? --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/mini-rfc-name-mangling-in-aot/9907/7) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/email/unsubscribe/65d6ae5991e49e86b42bd4ae8fd7c8ff6f24a8851186a67b8ea165626a1050ec).
