@tqchen: Thank you very much for clarifying all the points in details.
Will sure cover all the points you mentioned in future RFCs.
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/closed-discuss-addional-points-on-top-of-module-based-model-runtime-interface/6663/4)
to respond.
You are receivi
Ok. Thanks for clarification. I will update the PR.
---
[Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/rfc-relay-to-onnx/6101/26) to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from these emails, [click
here](https://discuss.tvm.ai/email/unsubscribe/87c25
I don;t think we need to do that. Just like the case of SourceModule, they are
not registered anywhere.
As the code base refactors further, we could introduce it to the target built,
when it is clear that the case of ONNX requires the IRModule to contain relay
functions instead of TIR funct
First of all, given that the topic is still relates to the Module based runtime
interface. I think it should be discussed that that thread. I am not too sure
about originality arugment.
In a nutshell though, we should always want to ask whether the features is
needed, the additional engineeri
@tqchen, Just to be on same page. Could you please confirm below?
We need NOT to register ONNXModule as "target.build.onnx". If registered this
way, it will get invoked from here when we specify target as "onnx".
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/blob/2cd987d92724be0f859bfb624ce797f9c7016
W don't have to strictly go through the TIR part, as the target only means
IRModule-> runtime::Module. It is totally fine for target to take in IRModule
that contains relay functions. I agree that it would be useful to have a
ONNXModule as a runtime module.
---
[Visit Topic](https://discu
cc @tqchen, @FrozenGene, @haichen, @jonso, @liangfu, @whomallinterested.
---
[Visit
Topic](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/discuss-addional-points-on-top-of-module-based-model-runtime-interface/6663/2)
to respond.
You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode.
To unsubscribe from
@smallcoscat, Thanks. I also followed this tutorial and was able to create ONNX
codegen for external runtime. Relevant code in this PR:
https://github.com/maheshambule/tvm/pull/9
However, as suggested by @tqchen when I tried to implement 'ONNX' as target
(and not as external codegen), I am fa
Hi All, This thread will be on top of Original Thread of [Module Based Model
Runtime
Interface](https://discuss.tvm.ai/t/discuss-module-based-model-runtime-interface/5025).
As i believe the original thread is already been so long, so it will lose
originality if these points being discussed th
Hi @tqchen and @maheshambule,
Refer to TVM tutorial [Bring Your Own Codegen To
TVM](https://docs.tvm.ai/dev/relay_bring_your_own_codegen.html), where details
how to create a self-defined c source module codegen.
However, ONNX is not a _C_ source module, we should define an ONNX module node
f
10 matches
Mail list logo
