Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Traffic Server 6.2.0 is released!

2016-08-19 Thread sebb
What is the project about? Why should I be interested in it? [rhetorical questions] The Announce emails are sent to people not on the developer or user lists. Most will have no idea what the project is about. So the e-mails should contain at least brief details of what the product does, and some

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Traffic Server 7.0.0 is Released!

2016-11-08 Thread sebb
What is the project about? Why should I be interested in it? [rhetorical questions] The Announce emails are sent to people not on the developer or user lists. Most will have no idea what the project is about. So the e-mails should contain at least brief details of what the product does, and some

Re: Cron /x1/home/apsite/wrkdir/bin/build.sh

2012-06-06 Thread sebb
On 6 June 2012 10:17, Igor Galić wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> Sorry, but the project script does not currently support redirected >> URLs or HTTPS (to which this URL redirects). >> >> Is there a copy of the DOAP somehere else which is accessible via >> HTTP ? > > > Is there any way

Re: Cron /x1/home/apsite/wrkdir/bin/build.sh

2012-06-06 Thread sebb
On 6 June 2012 20:16, Igor Galić wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> On 6 June 2012 10:17, Igor Galić wrote: >> > >> > >> > - Original Message - >> >> Sorry, but the project script does not currently support >> >> redirected >> >> URLs or HTTPS (to which this URL redirects). >> >

Re: Cron /x1/home/apsite/wrkdir/bin/build.sh

2012-06-06 Thread sebb
On 6 June 2012 20:47, Igor Galić wrote: > >> >> > Is there any way we can fix this code to use something like LWP? >> >> >> >> In theory yes, but someone has to do the work. >> > >> > Can you tell me where that script lives? >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site-tools/trunk/pr

Re: Cron /x1/home/apsite/wrkdir/bin/build.sh

2012-06-06 Thread sebb
On 6 June 2012 22:04, Igor Galić wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> On 6 June 2012 20:47, Igor Galić wrote: >> > >> >> >> > Is there any way we can fix this code to use something like >> >> >> > LWP? >> >> >> >> >> >> In theory yes, but someone has to do the work. >> >> > >> >> > Can yo