You might want to turn on slow log and see where the requests over 10ms are
taking time in the request process.
-Bryan
On Jan 17, 2014, at 3:29 PM, Kanishka . wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to configure an Apache server and ATS on a host. For us,
> the latency matters more than RPS/QPS
first of all ,thanks to you all,
I'm working with ATS 3.2.5 in my record config I could not see your mail
till now, I accidentally archived them
Uri,
I tested it again now, and I see that the latency is almost the same, so
will put that a side.
and no, there are no dramatic changes in the record
> does "CONFIG proxy.config.http.chunking_enabled INT 1" does that make any
> changes in the transform?
> in any case, I see the CPU spikes, but nothing dramatic."
I suspect that disabling chunking will make ATS disable keep alive. It will
indicate
the end of the transformed stream to the user-a
Hello,
Ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-2520.
I am a newbie in ATS, but I would like to contribute. Can I implement
a patch to solve this?
Regards.
--
Alex Garzão
Projetista de Software
Azion Technologies
alex.garzao (at) azion.com
If you want to implement it, you can submit a patch to the ticket you created.
-Bryan
On Jan 22, 2014, at 1:18 PM, Alex Garzão wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-2520.
>
> I am a newbie in ATS, but I would like to contribute. Can I implement
> a patch to so
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 09:18:02AM -0800, James Peach wrote:
> On Jan 20, 2014, at 8:27 AM, Alex Garz?o wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Are any plans to support TCP Fast Open (TFO) in ATS?
>
> I'm not aware of anyone currently working on this.
>
> On my reading of the kernel docs, you can enable T
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:18:45AM -0200, Alex Garz?o wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-2520.
>
> I am a newbie in ATS, but I would like to contribute. Can I implement
> a patch to solve this?
if you want to implement tcp fast open listening in traffic server,
I will be happy to help as well.
Regards,
Shaun
-Original Message-
From: Alan M. Carroll [mailto:a...@network-geographics.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 3:41 PM
To: dev@trafficserver.apache.org
Subject: Re: Support for HTTP Upgrade in transparent proxy
Tuesday, January 21, 2014,
I don't know how you implemented it in traffic server, but in traffic server we
do a setsockopt on the listening socket and there is a configuration option to
add additional options. This part would need to change and another
configuration option should be added for the queue size.
Happy to se