first of all ,thanks to you all, I'm working with ATS 3.2.5 in my record config I could not see your mail till now, I accidentally archived them
Uri, I tested it again now, and I see that the latency is almost the same, so will put that a side. and no, there are no dramatic changes in the record config Otto, does "CONFIG proxy.config.http.chunking_enabled INT 1" does that make any changes in the transform? in any case, I see the CPU spikes, but nothing dramatic. Leif, I added "proxy.config.http.chunking.size INT 64k" so I added it, it seems to improve how much we lost (about 10% improvement), still lost is still huge. BR, Roee On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 4:59 PM, roee gil <roe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to understand what are the trade off when I use transform. > so I did a speed test at this site: http://www.speedtest.net/ > > and checked it without ATS, with ATS with no plugins and finally ATS with > null transform plugin. > > between with and without ATS, I had not change at all, but when I added > the null transform, I had 50% of bandwidth (15MB instead of 30MB) and 20ms > more latency (3ms was without plugin) > > I have 2 question in this subject > > 1. is it possible to stop a transform, and let the ATS continue the > session without the plugin > 2. is it possible to reduce this number to some less then 50% bandwidth, > and 20ms more? > > BR, > Roee >
