Hmmm... use of IRC as a development process is not recommended.
Even if logged and posted, it still, by its very nature, excludes
people due to timezone differences and the like. Occasional
uses of IRC (and other more "real-time" events like f2f and
hackathons) are OK but rare.
Having an "official
Hello
Still following this conversation with interest, IRC is in fact a very
powerful tool in open source communities, log on to #plone for instance,
a lot of people and developers hang out there every day and answer
questions, collaborate with each other and otherwise interact with each
other.
#p
On 19 Nov 2010, at 13:24, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Hmmm... use of IRC as a development process is not recommended.
> Even if logged and posted, it still, by its very nature, excludes
> people due to timezone differences and the like. Occasional
> uses of IRC (and other more "real-time" events like
In the dev meeting there was an agreement that we would use Doxygen for
reference and some other text system for more general documents. A concern was
the ability to link from the general documentation to the reference (e.g., if
an API call is discussed, that should have a link directly to the r
On Nov 19, 2010, at 9:38 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
>
> On 19 Nov 2010, at 13:24, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> Hmmm... use of IRC as a development process is not recommended.
>> Even if logged and posted, it still, by its very nature, excludes
>> people due to timezone differences and the like. Occasiona
On 11/18/2010 04:19 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
Hi all,
As per the discussion today, the dev meetings will be held on
Tuesdays, at 9.30am PST. Meeting agendas will be set the Monday before
(noon).
The next such IRC meeting will be held on Tuesday 11/30. Please email
me suggestions for topics t
Somewhere an IRC angel wept
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 10:24 -0700, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> On 11/18/2010 04:19 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As per the discussion today, the dev meetings will be held on
> > Tuesdays, at 9.30am PST. Meeting agendas will be set the Monday before
> > (no
Hi all,
I would like to submit a request that Apache Traffic Server gets added
to the Coverity Scan system. The first step for their signup process is
to agree on a contact person. To speed things up, I'd like to nominate
myself as the contact person. Of course anyone else can be nominated
On 11/19/2010 11:47 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to submit a request that Apache Traffic Server gets
added to the Coverity Scan system. The first step for their signup
process is to agree on a contact person. To speed things up, I'd like
to nominate myself as the contact per
As I said, occasional irc chats, or very *directed and focused*
IRC chats are fine... it's the standing ones which are a concern.
For example, someone my decide not to bring something up on dev@
because "well, I'll just bring it up at the irc meeting" and so
the irc meetings would evolve into the p
- "Jim Jagielski" wrote:
> Hmmm... use of IRC as a development process is not recommended.
> Even if logged and posted, it still, by its very nature, excludes
I believe that rather than posting the logs alone it would
make sense to give a summary of what was discussed and
what conclusions -
Hi,
what do you all think about moving libinktomi++/ink_atomic.h to
ts/atomic.h, and make it part of the public APIs? We'd then also, of
course, rename them accordingly, e.g.
ink_atomic_swap() -> TSAtomiSwap()
ink_atomic_cas() -> TSAtomicCAS()
etc. This would be useful I think for
One problem is that if you move something to public API, you force it to be C
compatible, rather than C++ enabled, which impacts internal development.
Friday, November 19, 2010, 5:18:26 PM, you wrote:
> Hi,
> what do you all think about moving libinktomi++/ink_atomic.h to
> ts/atomic.h, an
On 11/19/2010 05:42 PM, Alan M. Carroll wrote:
One problem is that if you move something to public API, you force it to be C
compatible, rather than C++ enabled, which impacts internal development.
Hmmm, I only briefly looked at ink_atomic.h before posting, is there
anything in there that is
14 matches
Mail list logo
