;>>
>>>> 在 2015年2月6日，上午5:07，James Peach 写道：
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 5, 2015, at 12:16 PM, Bin Zeng wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> It is great someone is expanding the functionality of traffic_line.
>>>>&
- Yongming Zhao 赵永明
>>
>>> 在 2015年2月6日，上午5:07，James Peach 写道：
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Feb 5, 2015, at 12:16 PM, Bin Zeng wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It is great someone is expanding the functionality of traffic_line.
>>>> *thumbs up
ds to traffic_ctl. What commands
> were you thinking of?
>
>>
>> thanks
>>
>>
>> - Yongming Zhao 赵永明
>>
>>> 在 2015年2月6日，上午5:07，James Peach 写道：
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Feb 5, 2015, at 12:16 PM, Bin Zeng wrote:
>>>>
>
>>
>>> On Feb 5, 2015, at 12:16 PM, Bin Zeng wrote:
>>>
>>> It is great someone is expanding the functionality of traffic_line. *thumbs
>>> up*. My questions might sound naive. Why are we replacing traffic_line with
>>> traffic_ctl (traffic_ctl
t; It is great someone is expanding the functionality of traffic_line. *thumbs
>>> up*. My questions might sound naive. Why are we replacing traffic_line with
>>> traffic_ctl (traffic_ctl is a better name arguably)? It seems disruptive to
>>> retire traffic_line
t;> On Feb 5, 2015, at 12:16 PM, Bin Zeng wrote:
>>
>> It is great someone is expanding the functionality of traffic_line. *thumbs
>> up*. My questions might sound naive. Why are we replacing traffic_line with
>> traffic_ctl (traffic_ctl is a better name arguably)? It seem
> On Feb 5, 2015, at 12:16 PM, Bin Zeng wrote:
>
> It is great someone is expanding the functionality of traffic_line. *thumbs
> up*. My questions might sound naive. Why are we replacing traffic_line with
> traffic_ctl (traffic_ctl is a better name arguably)? It seems disrupti
It is great someone is expanding the functionality of traffic_line. *thumbs
up*. My questions might sound naive. Why are we replacing traffic_line with
traffic_ctl (traffic_ctl is a better name arguably)? It seems disruptive to
retire traffic_line because some people might depend on it. Is
Hi all,
Just a heads-up. I've been frustrated by the limits of traffic_line for a while
now, so I finally got around to implementing a replacement. Next week
(hopefully), I'll be landing a new tool named traffic_ctl (TS-3367). This is
intended as a replacement for traffic_line, with a regular e
