----- On 6 Feb, 2015, at 05:12, James Peach jpe...@apache.org wrote:

>> On Feb 5, 2015, at 5:35 PM, Yongming Zhao <ming....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> UI is most end user cares, I’d like we should keep the traffic_line. 
>> traffic_ctl
>> sounds perfect, can we have both?
> 
> We can have both for a while, but I don't think we should have both forever.

we can replace traffic_line with a (shell?) script which calls to traffic_ctl
potentially, *maybe* with a deprecation warning. if we do, we can keep it
around "forever", for "backwards compatibility"


>> and can you please think of reimplement some of the commands in the removed
>> traffic_shell?
> 
> Yeh, it's really easy to add new subcommands to traffic_ctl. What commands 
> were
> you thinking of?
> 
>> 
>> thanks
>> 
>> 
>> - Yongming Zhao 赵永明
>> 
>>> 在 2015年2月6日,上午5:07,James Peach <jpe...@apache.org> 写道:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Feb 5, 2015, at 12:16 PM, Bin Zeng <bz...@linkedin.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> It is great someone is expanding the functionality of traffic_line. 
>>>> *thumbs up*.
>>>> My questions might sound naive. Why are we replacing traffic_line with
>>>> traffic_ctl (traffic_ctl is a better name arguably)? It seems disruptive to
>>>> retire traffic_line because some people might depend on it. Is there a way 
>>>> to
>>>> expand traffic_line in place with all the functionality you proposed to
>>>> maintain backwards compatibility?
>>> 
>>> I thought a lot about this, but in the end I don't think it's possible to 
>>> retain
>>> compatibility with the traffic_line options and add the new traffic_ctl
>>> subcommands. If it were possible, then the implementation and usage 
>>> complexity
>>> might be an issue.
>>> 
>>> Since traffic_line is unmodified, we can keep it around for as long as we 
>>> want.
>>> However, once traffic_ctl ships, it will be deprecated and no longer 
>>> enhanced.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> ________________________________________
>>>> From: James Peach [jpe...@apache.org]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 10:11 AM
>>>> To: dev
>>>> Subject: RFC: replacing traffic_line
>>>> 
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> 
>>>> Just a heads-up. I've been frustrated by the limits of traffic_line for a 
>>>> while
>>>> now, so I finally got around to implementing a replacement. Next week
>>>> (hopefully), I'll be landing a new tool named traffic_ctl (TS-3367). This 
>>>> is
>>>> intended as a replacement for traffic_line, with a regular extensible 
>>>> syntax
>>>> that will let us expose much more functionality.
>>>> 
>>>> traffic_line will remain in the tree, but I hope to remove it for the 6.0
>>>> release (TS-3368).
>>>> 
>>>> A sample traffic_ctl session:
>>>> 
>>>> [vagrant@localhost ~]$ sudo /opt/ats/bin/traffic_ctl
>>>> Usage: traffic_ctl [OPTIONS] CMD [ARGS ...]
>>>> 
>>>> Subcommands:
>>>>  alarm           Manipulate alarms
>>>>  cluster         Stop, restart and examine the cluster
>>>>  config          Manipulate configuration records
>>>>  metric          Manipulate performance metrics
>>>>  server          Stop, restart and examine the server
>>>>  storage         Manipulate cache storage
>>>> 
>>>> Options:
>>>> switch__________________type__default___description
>>>>    --debug             on    false     Enable debugging output
>>>> -h, --help                              Print usage information
>>>> -V, --version                           Print version string
>>>> 
>>>> [vagrant@localhost ~]$ sudo /opt/ats/bin/traffic_ctl config
>>>> Usage: traffic_ctl config CMD [ARGS ...]
>>>> 
>>>> Subcommands:
>>>>  describe        Show detailed information about configuration values
>>>>  get             Get one or more configuration values
>>>>  match           Get configuration matching a regular expression
>>>>  reload          Request a configuration reload
>>>>  set             Set a configuration value
>>>>  status          Check the configuration status
>>>> 
>>>> [vagrant@localhost ~]$ sudo /opt/ats/bin/traffic_ctl config match
>>>> Usage: traffic_ctl config match [OPTIONS] REGEX [REGEX ...]
>>>> 
>>>> Options:
>>>> switch__________________type__default___description
>>>>    --records           on    false     Emit output in records.config format
>>>> 
>>>> [vagrant@localhost ~]$ sudo /opt/ats/bin/traffic_ctl config match
>>>> proxy.config.ssl
>>>> proxy.config.ssl.number.threads: 0
>>>> ...
>>>> 
>>>> [vagrant@localhost ~]$ sudo /opt/ats/bin/traffic_ctl config match --records
>>>> proxy.config.ssl
>>>> CONFIG proxy.config.ssl.number.threads INT 0
>>>> CONFIG proxy.config.ssl.client.verify.server INT 0
>>>> ...
>>>> 
>>>> [vagrant@localhost ~]$ sudo /opt/ats/bin/traffic_ctl config get
>>>> proxy.config.ssl.enabled proxy.config.ssl.session_cache
>>>> proxy.config.ssl.enabled: 0
>>>> proxy.config.ssl.session_cache: 2
>>>> 
>>>> [vagrant@localhost ~]$ sudo /opt/ats/bin/traffic_ctl config set
>>>> proxy.config.dns.resolv_conf /my/great/resolv.conf
>>>> set proxy.config.dns.resolv_conf, restart required
>>>> 
>>>> [vagrant@localhost ~]$ sudo /opt/ats/bin/traffic_ctl config status
>>>> Apache Traffic Server - traffic_server - 5.3.0 - (build # 020509 on Feb  5 
>>>> 2015
>>>> at 09:19:53)
>>>> Started at Thu Feb  5 09:26:31 2015
>>>> Last reconfiguration at Thu Feb  5 09:26:30 2015
>>>> Configuration is current
>>>> traffic_server requires restarting
>>>> 
>>> 

-- 
Igor Galić

Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
Mail: i.ga...@brainsware.org
URL: http://brainsware.org/
GPG: 8716 7A9F 989B ABD5 100F  4008 F266 55D6 2998 1641

Reply via email to