On Jan 7, 2014, at 7:24 AM, Yongming Zhao wrote:
> according to
> http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#options-systemrequirements :
>> System Requirements
>>
>> If a PMC wishes to build a product that takes a core dependency on some
>> third-party work that is only available under an exclud
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:28 AM, James Peach wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2014, at 1:06 AM, z...@apache.org wrote:
>
> > Updated Branches:
> > refs/heads/master 024db4624 -> 3344fdfc7
> >
> >
> > TS-2469: remove libreadline which is gpl licensed
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhao Yongming
> >
> >
> > Project: h
according to http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#options-systemrequirements
:
> System Requirements
>
> If a PMC wishes to build a product that takes a core dependency on some
> third-party work that is only available under an excluded license, the PMC
> might consider whether the work can
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 10:28:08AM -0800, James Peach wrote:
> I'm not very comfortable with this change. I don't think it fixes anything
> and I don't think that we have a good idea on how this affects distributions
> and end users. I'm perfectly happy with preferring libedit to libreadline,
On Jan 6, 2014, at 1:06 AM, z...@apache.org wrote:
> Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/master 024db4624 -> 3344fdfc7
>
>
> TS-2469: remove libreadline which is gpl licensed
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Yongming
>
>
> Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/trafficserver/repo
> Commit: http:
