Re: 2.0.0 release schedule proposal

2010-02-01 Thread George Paul
+1 on all 3 items. I've gone through the current 2.0.0 issues/features list on Jira and signed up for the ones I can commit to currently. -George On 2/1/10 2:08 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to make a number of "proposals" here for a release schedule. > Please comment and/or vot

Re: 2.0.0 release schedule proposal

2010-02-01 Thread Leif Hedstrom
On 02/01/2010 06:09 PM, John Plevyak wrote: +1, though I would like to see the list of features we want/anticipate for 2.0.0 and maybe some names (particularly if I am on that list :) I don't think you are on the hook for any of them, but feel free to look at that Jira list :

Re: 2.0.0 release schedule proposal

2010-02-01 Thread John Plevyak
+1, though I would like to see the list of features we want/anticipate for 2.0.0 and maybe some names (particularly if I am on that list :) john On 2/1/2010 2:08 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to make a number of "proposals" here for a release schedule. > Please comment

Re: 2.0.0 release schedule proposal

2010-02-01 Thread Leif Hedstrom
On 02/01/2010 05:42 PM, Nick Kew wrote: No votes yet, but +1 on taking a direction that can lead to release. It would be good to see the trunk-vs-dev issue sorted at the same time, so people like me know where to start from when hacking on the edges of the code or contributing patches. Yes

Re: 2.0.0 release schedule proposal

2010-02-01 Thread Nick Kew
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:08:06 -0700 Leif Hedstrom wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to make a number of "proposals" here for a release schedule. > Please comment and/or vote +- on each one of the items below. No votes yet, but +1 on taking a direction that can lead to release. It would be good to s