+1, though I would like to see the list of features
    we want/anticipate for 2.0.0 and maybe some names
    (particularly if I am on that list :)

john

On 2/1/2010 2:08 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I'd like to make a number of "proposals" here for a release schedule.
> Please comment and/or vote +- on each one of the items below.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- leif
> 
>   1. Feature freeze for 2.0.0 is 2/22 2010. Features that have not been
>      committed before this date will not make it into the 2.0.0
>      release. We create the 2.0.0 release branch on this day, and trunk
>      should be considered frozen the entire day (or until we declare it
>      open again on the mailing list).
>   2. We start preparing for an alpha release, following the release
>      management guidelines
>      (http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html). This
>      includes the PPMC voting on the release, and bring it to IPMC for
>      voting as well. This might take several iterations until we get a
>      release approved, so we can't schedule much beyond this. Any bugs
>      filed to pass the IPMC release approval will obviously have to be
>      fixed on both 2.0 release and trunk.
>   3. On 2/23 2010, trunk is considered open for development again. John
>      and George can start merging dev branch to trunk at their
>      convenience now.
> 
> 
> There are a number of steps for us to "resolve" in that guideline above,
> including the format of the STATUS file, and how to branch Paul
> suggested we do the branching and tagging like copy trunk to
> branches/2.0.x, then copy branches/2.0.x to tags/2.0.0. The release
> process above also has major dependencies on us closing all the bugs
> related to release, including RAT reports, any incompatible licenses and
> the TM issue.
> 
> 

Reply via email to