+1 - Sounds great.
-Bryan
> On Jun 21, 2018, at 11:39 AM, Walt Karas wrote:
>
> I think 9.0.0 probably makes more sense. It may be a fair amount of
> work for plugin maintainers.
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 1:03 PM, Bryan Call wrote:
>> It is a good idea to be more specific on the object ty
Yes, I'd rather do this for 9.0.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 1:39 PM, Walt Karas wrote:
> I think 9.0.0 probably makes more sense. It may be a fair amount of
> work for plugin maintainers.
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 1:03 PM, Bryan Call wrote:
> > It is a good idea to be more specific on the object
I think 9.0.0 probably makes more sense. It may be a fair amount of
work for plugin maintainers.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 1:03 PM, Bryan Call wrote:
> It is a good idea to be more specific on the object types. Were you thinking
> about having this go into 8.0.0?
>
> While I like the change, I wo
It is a good idea to be more specific on the object types. Were you thinking
about having this go into 8.0.0?
While I like the change, I would rather hold off until 9.0.0 since it isn’t
fully done and we are late in the release cycle for 8.0.0.
-Bryan
> On Jun 21, 2018, at 9:20 AM, Walt Kar
I've created the preliminary PR
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/3873 for this.
