> does "CONFIG proxy.config.http.chunking_enabled INT 1" does that make any
> changes in the transform?
> in any case, I see the CPU spikes, but nothing dramatic."
I suspect that disabling chunking will make ATS disable keep alive. It will
indicate
the end of the transformed stream to the user-a
first of all ,thanks to you all,
I'm working with ATS 3.2.5 in my record config I could not see your mail
till now, I accidentally archived them
Uri,
I tested it again now, and I see that the latency is almost the same, so
will put that a side.
and no, there are no dramatic changes in the record
On Jan 6, 2014, at 1:22 PM, Otto van der Schaaf wrote:
> Perhaps some of the performance loss you are seeing might be caused by ATS
> having to switch to a chunked transfer encoding when a transform is
> involved.
> What does cpu usage look like with and without a transform on your system?
+1. I
:59:46 +0200 Roee Gil wrote
> > Subject: Null transform slow down connection
> snip
> > I'm trying to understand what are the trade off when I use transform.
> > so I did a speed test at this site: http://www.speedtest.net/
> >
> > and checked it without ATS, with
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 16:59:46 +0200 Roee Gil wrote
> Subject: Null transform slow down connection
snip
> I'm trying to understand what are the trade off when I use transform.
> so I did a speed test at this site: http://www.speedtest.net/
>
> and checked it without ATS, with ATS
Hi all,
I'm trying to understand what are the trade off when I use transform.
so I did a speed test at this site: http://www.speedtest.net/
and checked it without ATS, with ATS with no plugins and finally ATS with
null transform plugin.
between with and without ATS, I had not change at all, but
