On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
> On May 19, 2014, at 2:19 PM, Samy Al Bahra wrote:
>
> > (also CK supports 32-bit architectures)
> >
> >
>
>
> I believe the concern were around some containers which were 64-bit only?
> But alas, I don’t think it was a big issue (but I’m
On May 19, 2014, at 2:19 PM, Samy Al Bahra wrote:
> (also CK supports 32-bit architectures)
>
>
I believe the concern were around some containers which were 64-bit only? But
alas, I don’t think it was a big issue (but I’m not very familiar with libck).
— leif
(also CK supports 32-bit architectures)
Phil Sorber writes:
>
> I'd like to propose that we pull libck into our tree and use it to replace
> some of our stuff like the freelist, ink_atomic_list and hash tables.
>
> http://concurrencykit.org/
>
> Right now there are not enough distro's to make just linking against system
> libs feasi
Phil is correct, while discussing ck and the architectures it supports we
proposed dropping 32bit support independent of ck.
Brian
On Saturday, April 12, 2014, Phil Sorber wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 2:00 PM, James Peach >
> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 11, 2014, at 11:34 AM, Phil Sorber >
> wrote:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 2:00 PM, James Peach wrote:
> On Apr 11, 2014, at 11:34 AM, Phil Sorber wrote:
>
> > I'd like to propose that we pull libck into our tree and use it to
> replace
> > some of our stuff like the freelist, ink_atomic_list and hash tables.
> >
> > http://concurrencykit.org/
>
On Apr 11, 2014, at 11:34 AM, Phil Sorber wrote:
> I'd like to propose that we pull libck into our tree and use it to replace
> some of our stuff like the freelist, ink_atomic_list and hash tables.
>
> http://concurrencykit.org/
>
> Right now there are not enough distro's to make just linking a
+1
> I'd like to propose that we pull libck into our tree and use it to replace
> some of our stuff like the freelist, ink_atomic_list and hash tables.
> http://concurrencykit.org/
> Right now there are not enough distro's to make just linking against system
> libs feasible, but I'd like to set
+ 1
On Friday, April 11, 2014, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> +1
>
> -- Leif
>
> On Apr 11, 2014, at 12:34 PM, Phil Sorber >
> wrote:
>
> > I'd like to propose that we pull libck into our tree and use it to
> replace
> > some of our stuff like the freelist, ink_atomic_list and hash tables.
> >
> > http:
+1
— Leif
On Apr 11, 2014, at 12:34 PM, Phil Sorber wrote:
> I'd like to propose that we pull libck into our tree and use it to replace
> some of our stuff like the freelist, ink_atomic_list and hash tables.
>
> http://concurrencykit.org/
>
> Right now there are not enough distro's to make ju
+1
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Phil Sorber wrote:
> I'd like to propose that we pull libck into our tree and use it to replace
> some of our stuff like the freelist, ink_atomic_list and hash tables.
>
> http://concurrencykit.org/
>
> Right now there are not enough distro's to make just li
I'd like to propose that we pull libck into our tree and use it to replace
some of our stuff like the freelist, ink_atomic_list and hash tables.
http://concurrencykit.org/
Right now there are not enough distro's to make just linking against system
libs feasible, but I'd like to set it up in such
12 matches
Mail list logo
