On Apr 11, 2014, at 11:34 AM, Phil Sorber <sor...@apache.org> wrote: > I'd like to propose that we pull libck into our tree and use it to replace > some of our stuff like the freelist, ink_atomic_list and hash tables. > > http://concurrencykit.org/ > > Right now there are not enough distro's to make just linking against system > libs feasible, but I'd like to set it up in such a way (configure time > option) so that we can encourage distro's to add a libck package in the > future.
So from the summit notes, it seems that dropping 32 bit is being proposed because Concurrency Kit only supports 64bit platform. Is that correct? I'm -1 on these changes until someone can explicitly list the current set of supported platforms, and then the new set. It's too hard to figure out what the new set of platforms will be otherwise, and I don't think it's reasonable to ask people to do that. Once we have this nailed down, I'll be +1 as long as Linux and OS X are on the final list. J
