+1
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 6:46 PM Bryan Call wrote:
> I would like to propose that we move from the IRC to Slack for IM
> communication by June 1st. This is in response to ASF moving to Slack for
> Infra and other channels and spamming that has happened on the IRC over the
&g
can either
> use something like what IRC does, with a bot that archives, or a
> solution like is used here: https://levels.io/slack-export-to-html/ .
> (The latter approach requires an admin account, though.)
>
> And yeah, I don't like that it requires an invite, but we point new
>
+1
While Slack isn't my favourite, I think the benefits outweigh the
costs. One of the biggest costs is the archive search. You can either
use something like what IRC does, with a bot that archives, or a
solution like is used here: https://levels.io/slack-export-to-html/ .
(The latter app
y real questions that
> require a more thorough response be initiated via mail list or by issue
> tracker. I.e non supported com channel but it’s there
This is implicit and doesn’t change whether we use slack, IRC or pidgins. All
decision making is done exclusively on the mailing list.
— L
le
>>>>> who just want to ask a question dont have an easy way to be able to
>>>>> get in. So maybe there should be some change on the site to notify
>>>>> that they should request access on the mailing list or something like
>>>>> that
>>&
t; that
>>>
>>> Most project use https://github.com/rauchg/slackin to automatically issue
>>> invites. We should do that here as well.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 5:45 PM Bryan Call wrote:
>>>>>
>>&g
atically issue
>> invites. We should do that here as well.
>>
>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 5:45 PM Bryan Call wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I would like to propose that we move from the IRC to Slack for IM
>>>> communication by June 1
o that here as well.
>
>>
>>> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 5:45 PM Bryan Call wrote:
>>>
>>> I would like to propose that we move from the IRC to Slack for IM
>>> communication by June 1st. This is in response to ASF moving to Slack for
>>> Infr
, May 10, 2019 at 5:45 PM Bryan Call wrote:
>>
>> I would like to propose that we move from the IRC to Slack for IM
>> communication by June 1st. This is in response to ASF moving to Slack for
>> Infra and other channels and spamming that has happened on the IRC over the
+1 .. Finally
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 4:45 PM, Bryan Call wrote: I
would like to propose that we move from the IRC to Slack for IM communication
by June 1st. This is in response to ASF moving to Slack for Infra and other
channels and spamming that has
able to
> get in. So maybe there should be some change on the site to notify
> that they should request access on the mailing list or something like
> that
>
All @apache.org people can automatically join. The filter is reasonable IMO,
since it avoids the massive spam issues we’ve h
request access on the mailing list or something like
that
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 5:45 PM Bryan Call wrote:
>
> I would like to propose that we move from the IRC to Slack for IM
> communication by June 1st. This is in response to ASF moving to Slack for
> Infra and other channels
+1
> On May 10, 2019, at 8:20 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
> +1
>
>> On May 10, 2019, at 17:45, Bryan Call wrote:
>>
>> I would like to propose that we move from the IRC to Slack for IM
>> communication by June 1st. This is in response to ASF moving to Sl
+1
> On May 10, 2019, at 17:45, Bryan Call wrote:
>
> I would like to propose that we move from the IRC to Slack for IM
> communication by June 1st. This is in response to ASF moving to Slack for
> Infra and other channels and spamming that has happened on the IRC over t
+1
> On May 10, 2019, at 4:45 PM, Bryan Call wrote:
>
> I would like to propose that we move from the IRC to Slack for IM
> communication by June 1st. This is in response to ASF moving to Slack for
> Infra and other channels and spamming that has happened on the IRC over t
+1
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 4:54 PM Walt Karas wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 6:45 PM Bryan Call wrote:
>>
>> I would like to propose that we move from the IRC to Slack for IM
>> communication by June 1st. This is in response to ASF moving to Slack fo
+1
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 6:45 PM Bryan Call wrote:
> I would like to propose that we move from the IRC to Slack for IM
> communication by June 1st. This is in response to ASF moving to Slack for
> Infra and other channels and spamming that has happened on the IRC over the
&g
I would like to propose that we move from the IRC to Slack for IM communication
by June 1st. This is in response to ASF moving to Slack for Infra and other
channels and spamming that has happened on the IRC over the last year.
This would require that people without an apache.org email address
Hi all,
Just a note that we have enabled logging for #traffic-server IRC channel. You
can view the archives here:
http://wilderness.apache.org/channels/#logs-#traffic-server
cheers,
James
On 9/23/2014 8:36 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
I’ll take a look at offing Jenkins again when I get back, Java is
blowing gaskets right now over email notifications, and I’m not really
a Java person… Suggestions how to fix that is much welcome :). Cheers,
— Leif
I suppose you need to sit down wit
On Sep 23, 2014, at 3:05 PM, James Peach wrote:
> Hey Leif,
>
> What do you think about enabling the IRC bot for ci.trafficserver.apache.org?
> The email notification seems pretty crashy, and I think that it would be
> helpful to have IRC notifications, provided they are not
Hey Leif,
What do you think about enabling the IRC bot for ci.trafficserver.apache.org?
The email notification seems pretty crashy, and I think that it would be
helpful to have IRC notifications, provided they are not extremely noisy
J
From: Leif Hedstrom [mailto:zw...@apache.org]
>> > Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 3:53 PM
>> > To: us...@trafficserver.apache.org
>> > Cc: Eagen, Dave
>> > Subject: Re: IRC disconnects
>> >
>> > On 10/12/12 2:36 PM, Eagen, Dave wrote:
>> >
hese
> problems).
>
> -- Leif
>
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Leif Hedstrom [mailto:zw...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 3:53 PM
> > To: us...@trafficserver.apache.org
> > Cc: Eagen, Dave
> > Subject: Re: IRC disconnects
> >
>
- "Jim Jagielski" wrote:
> Hmmm... use of IRC as a development process is not recommended.
> Even if logged and posted, it still, by its very nature, excludes
I believe that rather than posting the logs alone it would
make sense to give a summary of what was discussed and
On Nov 19, 2010, at 9:38 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
>
> On 19 Nov 2010, at 13:24, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> Hmmm... use of IRC as a development process is not recommended.
>> Even if logged and posted, it still, by its very nature, excludes
>> people due to timezo
On 19 Nov 2010, at 13:24, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Hmmm... use of IRC as a development process is not recommended.
> Even if logged and posted, it still, by its very nature, excludes
> people due to timezone differences and the like. Occasional
> uses of IRC (and other more "real-
Hello
Still following this conversation with interest, IRC is in fact a very
powerful tool in open source communities, log on to #plone for instance,
a lot of people and developers hang out there every day and answer
questions, collaborate with each other and otherwise interact with each
other
Hmmm... use of IRC as a development process is not recommended.
Even if logged and posted, it still, by its very nature, excludes
people due to timezone differences and the like. Occasional
uses of IRC (and other more "real-time" events like f2f and
hackathons) are OK but rare.
Hi all,
here's the agenda items I have, but we can certainly add more as we get
started, and the floor will be open after the items on the agenda are
covered. I'd like to keep this meeting to no longer than 1h I personally
have to leave at 11am PST).
Cheers,
-- leif
1. Format of these m
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:26:09 -0700
Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> Bummer. Well, one thing for the first Agenda would be then to discuss
> what other days would work better. Since you can't be there on Thursday,
> maybe email your preferences. I don't think we can schedule it much
> earlier than 10am
On 11/15/2010 06:47 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On 16 Nov 2010, at 00:37, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
Where: #ts-weekly-dev on irc.freenode.net (standard IRC server for Apache)
When: Every Thursday at 10am PST
That time of day/week precludes me, as I'm en route to a weekly event at 6pm
UK time
On 16 Nov 2010, at 00:37, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>Where: #ts-weekly-dev on irc.freenode.net (standard IRC server for Apache)
>When: Every Thursday at 10am PST
That time of day/week precludes me, as I'm en route to a weekly event at 6pm
UK time on a Thursday.
--
Nick Kew
sweet! Will be there!
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> in order to get us to sync up for upcoming releases, and all be able to
> discuss things a little more interactively, I'd like to propose we have an
> official (and public) IRC sessio
Hi all,
in order to get us to sync up for upcoming releases, and all be able to
discuss things a little more interactively, I'd like to propose we have
an official (and public) IRC session for all developers. My proposal is
that we join up on
Where: #ts-weekly-dev on irc.freenod
We're trying to hang out on #traffic-server on Freenode, please join us
if you can.
-- leif
36 matches
Mail list logo
