Re: [VOTE] Release v5.2.1

> On Mar 30, 2015, at 10:04 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > >> >> On Mar 24, 2015, at 5:45 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: >> >> >>> On Mar 23, 2015, at 8:31 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I've prepared a release candidate for v5.2.1, which is a bug-fix over >>> v5.2.0. The followi

Re: [VOTE] Release v5.2.1

> On Mar 24, 2015, at 5:45 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > >> On Mar 23, 2015, at 8:31 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I've prepared a release candidate for v5.2.1, which is a bug-fix over >> v5.2.0. The following Jira’s have been addressed in this release: > > > I’ve prepared a

Re: [VOTE] Release v5.2.1

+1 (compiled, ran basic tests on RHEL6) On Monday, March 30, 2015 8:54 AM, Bryan Call wrote: +1 - Signatures and regression testing passed on Fedora 21 -Bryan > On Mar 24, 2015, at 4:45 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > >> On Mar 23, 2015, at 8:31 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release v5.2.1

+1 - Signatures and regression testing passed on Fedora 21 -Bryan > On Mar 24, 2015, at 4:45 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > >> On Mar 23, 2015, at 8:31 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I've prepared a release candidate for v5.2.1, which is a bug-fix over >> v5.2.0. The followi

Re: [VOTE] Release v5.2.1

> On Mar 24, 2015, at 5:45 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > >> On Mar 23, 2015, at 8:31 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I've prepared a release candidate for v5.2.1, which is a bug-fix over >> v5.2.0. The following Jira’s have been addressed in this release: > > > I’ve prepared a

Re: [VOTE] Release v5.2.1

- On 25 Mar, 2015, at 14:40, Igor Galić i.ga...@brainsware.org wrote: > - On 25 Mar, 2015, at 12:21, Leif Hedstrom zw...@apache.org wrote: > >> It happened again ? > > it's still happening. is probably a better way to put it, however, now > i can't no longer reliably tell what's causin

Re: [VOTE] Release v5.2.1

- On 25 Mar, 2015, at 12:21, Leif Hedstrom zw...@apache.org wrote: > It happened again ? it's still happening. is probably a better way to put it, however, now i can't no longer reliably tell what's causing it. i'll have to investigate properly. i > -- Leif > > > >> On Mar 24, 2015, a

Re: [VOTE] Release v5.2.1

It happened again ? -- Leif > On Mar 24, 2015, at 9:29 PM, Igor Galić wrote: > > > > > this may have been a bit premature :| > > https://gist.github.com/igalic/875134e7b6ee35f252c4 > > - On 25 Mar, 2015, at 02:08, Igor Galić i.ga...@brainsware.org wrote: > >> this looks good, i.e.:

Re: [VOTE] Release v5.2.1

Note that the new RC does not fix Igor's issue. His cache is in a state where clearing it is the only way out. We are still investigating this issue, but I'm pretty confident it's not specific to the 5.2.1 release candidate. We have seen it twice now on different instances of ATS. I will file a

Re: [VOTE] Release v5.2.1

this may have been a bit premature :| https://gist.github.com/igalic/875134e7b6ee35f252c4 - On 25 Mar, 2015, at 02:08, Igor Galić i.ga...@brainsware.org wrote: > this looks good, i.e.: it fixes the assert. > +1 from me. > > > > caveat: i had to wipe my cache for it to actually work :(

Re: [VOTE] Release v5.2.1

this looks good, i.e.: it fixes the assert. +1 from me. caveat: i had to wipe my cache for it to actually work :( - On 25 Mar, 2015, at 00:45, Leif Hedstrom zw...@apache.org wrote: >> On Mar 23, 2015, at 8:31 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I've prepared a release candid

Re: [VOTE] Release v5.2.1

> On Mar 23, 2015, at 8:31 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've prepared a release candidate for v5.2.1, which is a bug-fix over v5.2.0. > The following Jira’s have been addressed in this release: I’ve prepared a new candidate, RC1, which adds the following fix from master: *)

Re: [VOTE] Release v5.2.1

I've back ported to-3140 to 5.2.x, which seems to fix this. > On Mar 24, 2015, at 3:05 PM, Bryan Call wrote: > > I opened: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3464 > > > Alan, > Good find! > > > -Bryan > > >> On Mar 24, 2015, at 1:26

Re: [VOTE] Release v5.2.1

I opened: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3464 Alan, Good find! -Bryan > On Mar 24, 2015, at 1:26 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > >> On Mar 24, 2015, at 2:14 PM, Bryan Call > > wrote: >> >> I am able to reprodu

Re: [VOTE] Release v5.2.1

> On Mar 24, 2015, at 2:14 PM, Bryan Call wrote: > > I am able to reproduce the issue Alan is seeing... > > (gdb) bt full > #0 0x74ef28c7 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 > No symbol table info available. > #1 0x74ef452a in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6 > No symbol table inf

Re: [VOTE] Release v5.2.1

I am able to reproduce the issue Alan is seeing... (gdb) bt full #0 0x74ef28c7 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #1 0x74ef452a in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #2 0x77bb79fb in ink_die_die_die (retval=1) at

Re: [VOTE] Release v5.2.1

- On 24 Mar, 2015, at 16:22, Bryan Call wrote: > +1 - Signatures and regression testing passed on Fedora 21 as far as build goes / test / regression test goes: +1 built on Ubuntu 12.04 and 14.04 (by launchpad ;) > -Bryan >> On Mar 23, 2015, at 7:31 PM, Leif Hedstrom < zw...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release v5.2.1

I checked out 5.2.1-rc0, did a clean build and installed fresh. I made the following changes to records.config proxy.config.url.remap.remap_required INT 0proxy.config.http.redirection_enabled INT 1proxy.config.http.number_of_redirections INT 3 If I start this and do "curl --proxy localhost:8080

Re: [VOTE] Release v5.2.1

Well there is nothin in your report to work on, and we are using this exact version on many machines. I honestly have no idea what is going wrong in your system. -- Leif > On Mar 24, 2015, at 11:28 AM, Igor Galić wrote: > > > > - On 24 Mar, 2015, at 12:37, Leif Hedstrom zw...@apache.

Re: [VOTE] Release v5.2.1

- On 24 Mar, 2015, at 12:37, Leif Hedstrom zw...@apache.org wrote: >> On Mar 24, 2015, at 7:20 AM, Igor Galić wrote: >> >> >> >> updated to the rc, and still getting: > > "Still"? Any more details? You sure you don't have some old crud I n the path? probably not, this is a rather clea

Re: [VOTE] Release v5.2.1

+1 - Signatures and regression testing passed on Fedora 21 -Bryan > On Mar 23, 2015, at 7:31 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've prepared a release candidate for v5.2.1, which is a bug-fix over v5.2.0. > The following Jira’s have been addressed in this release: > > *) [TS-3437]

Re: [VOTE] Release v5.2.1

> On Mar 24, 2015, at 7:20 AM, Igor Galić wrote: > > > > updated to the rc, and still getting: "Still"? Any more details? You sure you don't have some old crud I n the path? -- Leif > > ==> /var/log/trafficserver/manager.log <== > [Mar 24 11:16:49.395] Manager {0x7f7530f28780} ERROR:

Re: [VOTE] Release v5.2.1

updated to the rc, and still getting: ==> /var/log/trafficserver/manager.log <== [Mar 24 11:16:49.395] Manager {0x7f7530f28780} ERROR: [LocalManager::pollMgmtProcessServer] Server Process terminated due to Sig 11: Segmentation fault [Mar 24 11:16:49.395] Manager {0x7f7530f28780} ERROR: [Alarms

Re: [VOTE] Release v5.2.1

> On Mar 23, 2015, at 8:31 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've prepared a release candidate for v5.2.1, which is a bug-fix over v5.2.0. > The following Jira’s have been addressed in this release: > > *) [TS-3437] A null dhParams file will disable DHE. > > *) [TS-3424] SSL Failed:

[VOTE] Release v5.2.1

Hi all, I've prepared a release candidate for v5.2.1, which is a bug-fix over v5.2.0. The following Jira’s have been addressed in this release: *) [TS-3437] A null dhParams file will disable DHE. *) [TS-3424] SSL Failed: decryption failed or bad record mac. *) [TS-3439] Chunked responses