Re: [FEATURE REMOVAL v6.0.0] HTTP/0.9 support

> On Apr 27, 2015, at 9:41 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > >> On Apr 21, 2015, at 6:59 AM, Faysal Banna > > wrote: >> >> Sir. >> This depends i believe about the much usage and existence of HTTP/0.9 >> servers and clients around in the world especially if ATS is used a

Re: [FEATURE REMOVAL v6.0.0] HTTP/0.9 support

> On Apr 21, 2015, at 6:59 AM, Faysal Banna wrote: > > Sir. > This depends i believe about the much usage and existence of HTTP/0.9 servers > and clients around in the world especially if ATS is used as FORWARDED proxy > mode which you can never estimate what clients may use and what servers m

[FEATURE REMOVAL v6.0.0] HTTP/0.9 support

We today have a mechanism where the lowest denominator for HTTP is v0.9 (HTTP/0.9). Meaning, in some cases, we downgrade to HTTP/0.9. The suggestions is to change this, and make HTTP/1.0 our lowest supported HTTP version. This is inline with the RFCs as well, which recommends not support HTTP/0.