On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 18:33 -0400, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> Hmmm, our Debian6 build box has 0.9.8, and I can not seem to get it
> updated beyond that.
My bad. Debian 6 is squeeze (aka oldoldstable) not wheezy (aka
oldstable) so yeah Debian 6 only has 0.9.8.
Thanks,
--
Michael Graham
> On Jun 5, 2015, at 2:30 PM, Michael Graham wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 13:25 -0400, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>> Unless there are objections to this, we’ll officially remove support
>> for Debian6 and Ubuntu12 with ATS v6.0.0. This is inline with the
>> already agreed and approved removal of R
> On Jun 5, 2015, at 3:30 PM, James Peach wrote:
>
>
>> On Jun 5, 2015, at 10:25 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> In addition to removing build support for RHEL5 (and derivatives), I think
>> we need to ditch Debian6 and Ubuntu12 as well. Debian6 comes, from what I
>> can tell,
> On Jun 5, 2015, at 10:25 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> In addition to removing build support for RHEL5 (and derivatives), I think we
> need to ditch Debian6 and Ubuntu12 as well. Debian6 comes, from what I can
> tell, with OpenSSL 0.9.8, and Ubuntu12 comes with OpenSSL1.0.0. The
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:25 AM Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In addition to removing build support for RHEL5 (and derivatives), I think
> we need to ditch Debian6 and Ubuntu12 as well. Debian6 comes, from what I
> can tell, with OpenSSL 0.9.8, and Ubuntu12 comes with OpenSSL1.0.0. The
> mi
Hi all,
In addition to removing build support for RHEL5 (and derivatives), I think we
need to ditch Debian6 and Ubuntu12 as well. Debian6 comes, from what I can
tell, with OpenSSL 0.9.8, and Ubuntu12 comes with OpenSSL1.0.0. The minimum
version we’ve said to support, as defined by RHEL6, is Op
