[IF YOUR PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE GIT REPOSITORIES ON GIT-WIP-US PLEASE
DISREGARD THIS EMAIL; IT WAS MASS-MAILED TO ALL APACHE PROJECTS]
Hello Apache projects,
I am writing to you because you may have git repositories on the
git-wip-us server, which is slated to be decommissioned in the coming
mon
On 04/13/2016 03:21 PM, Susan Hinrichs wrote:
> Oh, and I double checked that my github account has two factor
> authentication enabled.
You need to accept the invitation from the ASF on GitHub to join the org
- your team membership is pending acceptance. MFA cannot be verified
unless you have acc
Folks, the switchover has happened.
Please use either GitHub or our new canonical URL,
https://git-dual.apache.org/repos/asf/trafficserver.git
With regards,
Daniel.
On 04/07/2016 07:17 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> In preparation for the migration to git-dual, if you are a committer, please
> visit
+1, just like before :)
On 09/09/2015 11:47 PM, Steven R. Feltner wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Phil Sorber [mailto:sor...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 6:26 PM
>> To: dev@trafficserver.apache.org; us...@trafficserver.apache.org
>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache
+1.
Apart from LuaJIT and the regression stuff (which is ignored, right?),
only one file is missing a license header,
"plugins/experimental/collapsed_connection/MurmurHash3.h"
Other than that:
- License and Notice in place
- No bad licenses found
- Sigs match, digests match
- It builds \o/
For
On 01/12/2014 03:35 AM, quehan wrote:
> I think it is 1G for all lua_States in one process.
>
>
> 在 2014-1-12，上午1:39，James Peach 写道：
>
>> On Jan 10, 2014, at 8:16 PM, quehan wrote:
>>
>>> hi, all:
>>>
>>> As far as I know, LuaJIT can only use 1G memory at most, so ts-lua is
>>> suggested to u
On 05/07/2013 05:37 AM, James Peach wrote:
> On May 6, 2013, at 3:30 PM, Igor Galić wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> Updated Branches:
>>> refs/heads/master c4815b077 -> da413c514
>>>
>>>
>>> Try to fix Solaris wclear macro build breakage
>>>
>>>
>>> Project: http://git-wip-us.
On 05/01/2013 02:49 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> On 4/30/13 6:13 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>> ing what the users of ATS have to say about this.
>>> Indeed. Debian (and its users) for example will get ATS 3.0 when the new
>>> stable version will be released presumably this week with its own 3 year
>>>
On 04/30/2013 04:47 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to propose that we EOL support for ATS v3.0 soon after we
> release v3.4.0. That would be around the June / July time frame. This
> leaves us with officially support two major releases simultaneously at
> any give time, plus the
On 04/24/2013 04:43 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> On 4/24/13 6:51 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
>> On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 22:54:47 +0100
>> Nick Kew wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I'll attach a mini demo-plugin that reproduces the problem.
>>> The essence of it can be boiled down to:
>> Magic sauce here.
>
> Indeed. I hate ma
+1 from here, tested on FreeBSD 9.1 - make, make check, make install, ts
-R and so on passed (surprise, surprise! I would've expected the SDK
checks to fail, as always ;) ).
With regards,
Daniel.
On 04/16/2013 12:35 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've prepared a release for v3.3.2, which
On 03/07/2013 03:31 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> On 3/4/13 11:15 PM, James Peach wrote:
>> On 28/02/2013, at 3:49 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>>
>>
>>> We still will support RHEL5 and later, which implies the lowest gcc
>>> version we need to support is gcc v4.1.2. RHEL5 kernel is v2.6.18,
>>> which is
On 02/28/2013 03:49 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> with RedHat moving RHEL4 into extended support as of 2012, I think we
> should stop supporting RHEL4 (and derivatives) for ATS. Meaning, we will
> no longer try to compile / run on these platforms.
>
> We still will support RHEL5 and late
With 7 binding +1 votes and 2 non-binding ones (and no 0s or -1s), this
proposal passes with flying colors. I'll start prepping the site for
this new page.
With regards,
Daniel.
Hi fellow dev@ people,
We've been discussing the possibility of adding a page where third
parties can get a mention if they support or do consulting on Apache
Traffic Server, in the hopes that people seeking professional help can
find it. As such, I have made a draft of a page that does just that,
Hi wonderful dev@ list,
We're looking into compiling a list of companies and individuals that do
consulting on or support of Traffic Server, and so we're asking anyone,
who either do this themselves or work for a company that does so, to
step forward and confess ;)
This will be an independently c
Hello, happy people,
Lately, I've been wrapping my head around Traffic Server 3.2/3.3 not
running well on FreeBSD. The exact issue is described in TS-993 as well:
1) When starting TS, it runs up a hefty CPU bill (100% cpu used at all
times), even when idling.
2) It crashes and burns when compiled
On 08/31/2012 09:34 PM, Igor Galić wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> I cut a tag for 3.3.0-dev and uploaded the tar ball to
>
>http://people.apache.org/~igalic/releases/
>
> Please test this thoroughly before casting your ±1 votes!
>
>
> For reference:
> -rw-r--r-- 1 igalic igalic74B Aug 31
Leif had an idea last night (yes, he does have those on occasion) about
making a script that would pick out a random traffic server bug, and I,
as usual, got put to work hashing out a working copy.
Well, here it is: http://trafficserver.apache.org/cgi-bin/random.cgi
If you're feeling like fixing a
On 07/16/2012 10:40 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> ACK
>
> On 16/07/2012, at 11:05 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hi Board,
>>
>> Please ACK the addition of Daniel Gruno (Humbedooh) to the Apache
>> Traffic Server PMC (See vote result [1]).
&g
On 07/15/2012 09:22 PM, Igor Galić wrote:
>
>
>
>> Another thing we might consider is either:
>> 1) let the comment system send notifications to one of the existing
>> mailing lists, OR
>> 2) set up a new mailing list for comments, so non-committers can
>> subscribe as well.
>
> Daniel, thank
Yes you, on the couch there!
The good man Igor and I have been working on integrating the new
comments.apache.org site into the traffic server documentation, allowing
readers to comment on any aspect of the documentation (or the server
software) they find interesting. One of the main reasons is tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/11/2012 06:40 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> On 3/22/12 9:50 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like for us to make a page with a list of who's using Apache
>> Traffic Server. It won't have to include any details, even
>> something simpl
23 matches
Mail list logo
