Hi Rob,
You should take a look at ironbee that does this:
https://github.com/ironbee/ironbee/tree/master/servers/trafficserver
-B
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 6:48 AM Rob Maidment wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It was good to meet everyone at the summit in Sunnyvale.
>
> I raised this question with a few peop
Ah, I misread what you said. Reenable with ERROR, then set the status in
SEND_RESPONSE_HDR. I was trying to do that in SEND_REQUEST_HEADER and just
need to delay this. Thanks!
-B
--
Brian Rectanus
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Uri Shachar wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> I'm not s
seems
to hang and eventually timeout waiting for the body. This timeout also
overrides the custom error page I just set.
So, generating the custom error is not the issue, but rather preventing the
transaction from being forwarded to the origin is the issue here.
Cheers!
-B
--
Brian Rectanus
On
the request body (at least part - for example
check file data is the type that is expected) and still prevent the
request headers/data from being sent to the origin server?
Cheers!
-B
--
Brian Rectanus
ews.
Additionally, what about putting the support end date on the download page
for the LTS releases? Might be a better place to manage the official
support dates.
Cheers!
-B
--
Brian Rectanus
vantage/disavantage to doing this either way? With some basic tests,
I see that I can get up to 10ms latency waiting for the IMMEDIATE to
trigger. I need to verify this with some better tests, but calling the
handle_output() directly makes this inconsistency seem to go away.
Cheers!
-B
--
Brian Rectanus
Same, threads dropped to 4: 16,000 tx/s
Same, threads dropped to 2: 14,000 tx/s
Really no CPU usage change in any tests.
Cheers!
-B
--
Brian Rectanus
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 2:41 AM, Brian Geffon wrote:
> I've also observed unexplained latency when it comes to transformations, I
>
On Wednesday, March 11, 2015, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 03:10 -0500, Brian Rectanus wrote:
> > I certainly have some cycles if someone can help point me in the right
> > direction. Right now I am at a loss as to where to dig. Profiler just
> shows
> >
86k 122k| 0 0 |7993 7175
5 11 84 0 0 0| 0 0 | 369k 502k| 0 0 | 15k 13k
-B
--
Brian Rectanus
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 2:41 AM, Brian Geffon wrote:
> I've also observed unexplained latency when it comes to transformations, I
> think it's time that we
ewhat used.
* I expect the threads to be saturated with work, but they are mostly idle.
Any ideas why the complete lack of CPU/thread utilization?
Any ideas what to look at?
Any ideas what I can enable (tools I could use) to see more insight into
what is happening?
Cheers!
-B
--
Brian Rectanus
am not
sure what this may affect at this point, I am not sure if this is a good
idea or not, but worth a look.
Cheers!
-B
--
Brian Rectanus
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:42 AM, James Peach wrote:
>
> On Sep 9, 2014, at 6:28 AM, Brian Rectanus wrote:
>
> > On Monday, September 8, 2014, Leif Hedstrom > > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Sep 8, 2014, at 9:43 PM, James Peach wrote:
> >>
&
On Monday, September 8, 2014, Leif Hedstrom > wrote:
>
> On Sep 8, 2014, at 9:43 PM, James Peach wrote:
>
> > On Sep 5, 2014, at 2:59 PM, Brian Rectanus wrote:
> >
> >> All,
> >>
> >> I have a pull request in that is a trivial patch to add a lo
/apache/trafficserver/pull/107.patch
Simple addition of:
/**
Set the rolling size. rolling_size_mb specifies the size in MB when
log rolling
should take place.
*/
tsapi void TSTextLogObjectRollingSizeMbSet(TSTextLogObject the_object, int
rolling_size_mb);
Cheers!
-B
--
Brian Rectanus
d20c60fd9b
Merge: 4c2b23f bab6d34
Author: Brian Rectanus
Date: Wed Mar 26 23:04:52 2014 -0500
luajit: Sync with upstream v2.0.3.
Conflicts:
libs/luajit-2.0-ironbee/Makefile
libs/luajit-2.0-ironbee/src/Makefile
commit bab6d34e7a07d90a3d90d6128525669f5f14f0f8
Author: Bria
? ()
No symbol table info available.
#2 0x in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
--
Brian Rectanus
Is there a problem with tagging the last rc version with the actual
released version when you release?
That is, part of the release process being:
git tag -s 4.1.2 4.1.2-rc0
If 4.1.2-rc0 is signed and trusted, then creating another tag off this
seems fine.
-B
--
Brian Rectanus | brecta
I sent this previously, but as a reply to the announcement which may have
gotten filtered...
Please, can someone tag 4.1.2 in git? There is only a 4.1.2-rc0, currently.
Cheers!
-B
--
Brian Rectanus | brecta...@qualys.com
There does not appear to be a 4.1.2 tag in git - only 4.1.2-rc0. Can
someone please tag 4.1.2?
Thanks,
-B
--
Brian Rectanus
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
> Apache Traffic Server v4.1.2 Released
>
> The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache Traff
19 matches
Mail list logo