I would love this! (I've been watching the project for a while but not
contributed anything yet)
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 1:54 AM Leif Hedstrom wrote:
> Also, I will take volunteers to host and lead sessions. We can’t let AMC
> have all the fun!
>
> — Leif
>
>
> > On Feb 2, 2021, at 15:27, Leif He
Also, I will take volunteers to host and lead sessions. We can’t let AMC have
all the fun!
— Leif
> On Feb 2, 2021, at 15:27, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Sparky suggested that we should do a better job getting new developers
> familiar with the ATS code base. As such, Bryan and I
This is an excellent idea. I have a whole team who could benefit.
Thanks
Nick
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 2, 2021, at 6:09 PM, Juncheng Yang wrote:
>
> I like the idea, it would be better if it will be recorded.
>
>
> Best,
> Jason
>
>
>> On Feb 2, 2021, at 5:26 PM, Leif Hedstrom wr
> On Feb 2, 2021, at 4:09 PM, Juncheng Yang wrote:
>
> I like the idea, it would be better if it will be recorded.
They would be recorded.
On Walts suggestions: We can do that (“tutorials”), I just worry that it will
go nowhere fast, whereas an interaction Zoom session, with one driver, an
I like the idea, it would be better if it will be recorded.
Best,
Jason
> On Feb 2, 2021, at 5:26 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Sparky suggested that we should do a better job getting new developers
> familiar with the ATS code base. As such, Bryan and I was thinking of maybe
The other option would be to write tutorials. If it's easier to do talks,
hopefully they would be recorded. We could scrape together money for a
tech writer and get written tutorials from the videos.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 4:35 PM Evan Zelkowitz wrote:
> Can put me down as interested in all of
Can put me down as interested in all of them, along with some
coworkers who probably won't post on here
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 3:27 PM Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Sparky suggested that we should do a better job getting new developers
> familiar with the ATS code base. As such, Bryan and
Hi all,
Sparky suggested that we should do a better job getting new developers familiar
with the ATS code base. As such, Bryan and I was thinking of maybe doing a few
4H Zoom sessions, each presenting and discussing some larger portion of the ATS
code base. Such as
1. The cache code
2. The Eve
+1 Sounds reasonable!
On Tuesday, February 2, 2021, 02:15:17 PM PST, vijay mamidi
wrote:
I propose TSHttpTxnServerRespNoStoreGet API as an addition to the InkAPI. (
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/7439)
Usage : A plugin can use TSHttpTxnServerRespNoStoreSet to make ATS not
I propose TSHttpTxnServerRespNoStoreGet API as an addition to the InkAPI. (
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/7439)
Usage : A plugin can use TSHttpTxnServerRespNoStoreSet to make ATS not
cache the Origin Server's response. Traffic Server does the right thing
using the flag api_server_re
Crossposting this to the ATS dev list: I wonder if there is a reasonably
straightforward
way I just missed to achieve the clean separation required?
> On 2 Feb 2021, at 05:50, supraja sridhar wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On sending a post request with chunked body to ATS + stream editor plugin I
11 matches
Mail list logo
