> On Feb 2, 2021, at 4:09 PM, Juncheng Yang <peter.waynech...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I like the idea, it would be better if it will be recorded.
They would be recorded.
On Walts suggestions: We can do that (“tutorials”), I just worry that it will
go nowhere fast, whereas an interaction Zoom session, with one driver, and many
listeners and participants, we can cover a lot of code together. I’m not
opposed to doing tutorials if that’s preferable.
Cheers,
— Leif
>
>
> Best,
> Jason
>
>
>> On Feb 2, 2021, at 5:26 PM, Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Sparky suggested that we should do a better job getting new developers
>> familiar with the ATS code base. As such, Bryan and I was thinking of maybe
>> doing a few 4H Zoom sessions, each presenting and discussing some larger
>> portion of the ATS code base. Such as
>>
>> 1. The cache code
>> 2. The Event System and processors
>> 3. The HttpSM
>> 4. Writing plugins / Plugin APIs
>>
>> Or other areas people feel worth discussing. This would definitely be
>> hardcode C/C++ madness, focusing on developers and definitely not users. We
>> would need to get an expert in each of these areas to hold each session. But
>> before we sign Alan up for this, I wanted to see if there’s a general
>> interest in this idea?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> -- Leif
>
