To answer both of you, you can put comments in the file so we can
1) Make RAT happy.
2) Make it clear it's just an editor support file, not a real make file.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Walt Karas
wrote:
> Is rat ci going to complain it has no license?
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 10:44 AM
Is rat ci going to complain it has no license?
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Derek Dagit wrote:
> If we can put a comment in the file to say as much, I think it would be OK.
>
> I would like to avoid confusion around whether this is sufficient or
> required to build independent of these other
If we can put a comment in the file to say as much, I think it would be OK.
I would like to avoid confusion around whether this is sufficient or
required to build independent of these other tools—it would be good to have
something about its status and what it is intended for.
I support making lif
A number of developers are now using editors (Visual Code, CLion) that
depend on have a CMakeLists.txt to describe all the source code. How much
objection would there be to putting this file in the root of the source
tree purely for editor support, without worrying about whether it can
actually bui
