To answer both of you, you can put comments in the file so we can 1) Make RAT happy. 2) Make it clear it's just an editor support file, not a real make file.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Walt Karas <wka...@oath.com.invalid> wrote: > Is rat ci going to complain it has no license? > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Derek Dagit <der...@oath.com.invalid> > wrote: > > If we can put a comment in the file to say as much, I think it would be > OK. > > > > I would like to avoid confusion around whether this is sufficient or > > required to build independent of these other tools—it would be good to > have > > something about its status and what it is intended for. > > > > I support making life easier for developers by committing such things to > > the repo, even if I don't use those tools. > > > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Alan Carroll < > > solidwallofc...@oath.com.invalid> wrote: > > > >> A number of developers are now using editors (Visual Code, CLion) that > >> depend on have a CMakeLists.txt to describe all the source code. How > much > >> objection would there be to putting this file in the root of the source > >> tree purely for editor support, without worrying about whether it can > >> actually build TS. > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Derek >
