Re: [Dependency Proposal] intel::tbb

Yea, I looked into Junction before tbb, until I found this comment on hacker news. Uhm... The absolute Y-position of the curve on the graph is secondary to > its shape. Also, the scalability discussion is largely pointless if the > sample set covers only 6 CPUs. > Intel TBB scales proportionally,

Re: [Dependency Proposal] intel::tbb

interesting to not the junction make will use TBB under the covers... for example: https://github.com/preshing/junction/blob/14c0b8f835d26899c22eb7e747ccdffb775c49f2/junction/extra/impl/MapAdapter_TBB.h On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Bryan Call wrote: > Here are some benchmark numbers I ran ac

Re: [Dependency Proposal] intel::tbb

Here are some benchmark numbers I ran across when looking at different thread safe hash implementations: Source: http://preshing.com/20160201/new-concurrent-hash-maps-for-cpp/ -Bryan > On Sep 29, 2017, at 2:42 PM, Bryan Call

Re: [Dependency Proposal] intel::tbb

TCL handles concurrency for memory allocation bits. Looking at it more, the hashtable part of the library doesn’t support currency and you would have to handle locking yourself. I created a test program to see when it was locking: #include "ink_hash_table.h" #include #include using namespace

Re: [Dependency Proposal] intel::tbb

I read the code of Tcl_HashTable. They say nothing about handling concurrency. The biggest concern about this is, as Alan and Bryan said, what level of use will we have for ATS. I read docs of TBB. It's offering rich tools of handling t

Re: [Dependency Proposal] intel::tbb

This seems like a large dependency to pull in to get a thread safe unordered map. We already have a dependency on Tcl_HashTable (InkHashTable), that handles concurrency, and it used throughout the code base. -Bryan > On Sep 28, 2017, at 5:55 PM, CrazyCow wrote: > > Hi, ATS devs, > > Curre

Re: [Dependency Proposal] intel::tbb

Seems the latest version supports FreeBSD and SunOS. https://github.com/01org/tbb/blob/tbb_2018/build/FreeBSD.inc https://github.com/01org/tbb/blob/tbb_2018/build/SunOS.inc 2017-09-29 8:26 GMT-07:00 James Peach : > > > On Sep 29, 2017, at 7:37 AM, Derek Dagit > wrote: > > > > 3) Does it run on p

Re: [Dependency Proposal] intel::tbb

> On Sep 29, 2017, at 7:37 AM, Derek Dagit wrote: > > 3) Does it run on platforms that are supported by ATS, like FreeBSD? I > thought there was not official support without patching it, but not > sure. https://www.threadingbuildingblocks.org/system-requirements AFAICT they claim x86-only and

Re: [Dependency Proposal] intel::tbb

3) Does it run on platforms that are supported by ATS, like FreeBSD? I thought there was not official support without patching it, but not sure. On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Alan Carroll wrote: > There are two big issues for me: > > 1) What level of use will we have in the rest of the ATS cor