> On Jan 22, 2016, at 1:58 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
>
>> On Jan 19, 2016, at 11:51 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've prepared a release candidate for v6.1.0-RC1, changes since v6.0.0
>> include:
>>
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?project
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/439
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/437
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user jsime opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/439
[TS-4138] Docs: documentation for experimental url_sig plugin
- Adapts README documentation from experimental url_sig plugin into
Administrator's Guide documentation.
You can merge this pull r
> On Jan 26, 2016, at 11:07 AM, Alan Carroll
> wrote:
>
> My view is that getting or at least having a target source tree that is
> better organized is a big help in doing the things HRP wants to do. Certainly
> when I have looked at doing that sort of cleanup, the current structure is an
>
So the alternative build system is a low priority item as if we clean up the
automake files they will be easier to maintain and understand. For me it more
about being able to easily use other systems to build ATS. Personally I would
like to make a Scons/Parts build setup for ATS. I am a little
I recall your concerns at the last summate.
So I believe this proposal is to avoid big bang by making a set of small and
lots of small pull requests. I do have a OneNote page with general depends in
it I can copy paste my notes here if people want to see it. ( it will be a
little ugly FYI as th
Can you talk more about the alternative build system? This is one that I
don't think we need to change really, but I am open to the idea and want to
understand it better.
Thanks.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:11 PM Jason Kenny
wrote:
> Thank you for your input.
> Items like P_ I_ and other general
Thank you for your input.
Items like P_ I_ and other general code clean up I was hoping to do in a
different phase. many of us could easy make a massive diff with all most of the
issues corrected. However this diff would make most of our heads explode. I
think that it is very important to make
My view is that getting or at least having a target source tree that is better
organized is a big help in doing the things HRP wants to do. Certainly when I
have looked at doing that sort of cleanup, the current structure is an
impediment. For example, the RPC logic needs to be pulled out of mgm
I really think that developer time would be better spent on projects like
removing the Tcl dependency, figuring out whether proxy/StatSystem.cc is really
needed any more, cleaning up the XML dependencies, removing STL containers
where it makes sense, improving test coverage and usability, making
This seems generally good to me. I welcome a more modern structure. I also
prefer the first layout you mentioned, but it may be necessary to do the
second layout and then move to the first. That might make others more
comfortable. I personally see a lot of value in what you describe, but I
know oth
+1 - Running with HTTP(S) and HTTP/2 in production without any issues with an
ASAN build on RHEL 7.1. I also built and tested on Fedora 23.
-Bryan
> On Jan 25, 2016, at 8:27 PM, Bryan Call wrote:
>
> The cause of the first issue was our build system (at work), so I am not
> seeing an issu
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/438
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user sc0ttbeardsley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/438#issuecomment-175079288
I can haz a merge?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
15 matches
Mail list logo
