> On Jan 26, 2016, at 11:07 AM, Alan Carroll > <solidwallofc...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote: > > My view is that getting or at least having a target source tree that is > better organized is a big help in doing the things HRP wants to do. Certainly > when I have looked at doing that sort of cleanup, the current structure is an > impediment. For example, the RPC logic needs to be pulled out of mgmt and put > in a separate library so it can be linked easily by any executable. But where > does that go? I suppose lib/rpc but it's unclear.
Sure, but we need to be really specific here in order to understand the proposal. What exactly do you mean by the "RPC logic"? Just MgmtMarshall.cc and NetworkMessage.cc? Everything NetworkMessage.cc depends on? Or do you mean the libmgmt API? > I have mixed feelings about the big shift vs. gradual. The former is more > painful but only for a short while. The latter drags out the pain so it's a > somewhat chronic condition. In either case, though, we'd need a final target > that we are working toward. If you understand how to decouple a dependency, then I think the best approach is to just decouple that dependency and move on to the next. Given a specific change, we can understand what it means and where is belongs.
