Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/91
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
On May 29, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
> On May 28, 2014, at 10:12 PM, James Peach wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to add a session-oriented counterpart to TSHttpIsInternalRequest,
>> named TSHttpIsInternalSession:
>>
>> TSReturnCode TSHttpIsInternalSession(TSHttpSsn s
On May 28, 2014, at 10:12 PM, James Peach wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to add a session-oriented counterpart to TSHttpIsInternalRequest,
> named TSHttpIsInternalSession:
>
> TSReturnCode TSHttpIsInternalSession(TSHttpSsn ssnp);
After reviewing another bug, I’m wondering if we should
Hi all,
I’d like to remove the following branches in our git repo. If any of you (one
“vote” is enough) want to preserve/keep any of these, please voice that opinion
in the next 72h.
Thanks,
— leif
remotes/origin/TS-645
remotes/origin/TS-645-hard-restart
remotes/origin/consistent-errors
+1
> On May 28, 2014, at 10:12 PM, James Peach wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to add a session-oriented counterpart to TSHttpIsInternalRequest,
> named TSHttpIsInternalSession:
>
>TSReturnCode TSHttpIsInternalSession(TSHttpSsn ssnp);
>
> This API has identical semantics to TSHttpIsInter
On May 29, 2014, at 12:19 AM, Wei Sun wrote:
>
>
> On 5/29/14, 1:36 AM, "Bryan Call" wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 26, 2014, at 6:00 PM, James Peach wrote:
>>
>>> Bryan,
>>>
>>> How are you expecting proxy.process.ssl.total_handshake_time to be
>>> used? What units is it in? Unless I'm missing so
On 5/29/14, 1:36 AM, "Bryan Call" wrote:
>
>On May 26, 2014, at 6:00 PM, James Peach wrote:
>
>> Bryan,
>>
>> How are you expecting proxy.process.ssl.total_handshake_time to be
>>used? What units is it in? Unless I'm missing something, the aggregate
>>handshake time does not seem very interes
