On Nov 2, 2013, at 10:22 PM, Alan M. Carroll
wrote:
> Sorry, running too many bugs. The fix is in TS-1424, commit f63b27d52.
>
> It got mixed in because it was entangled with propagating a related error
> condition for TS-1424.
>
>
Aha. Then yes, 4.0.2 does not have this patch, but curren
On Oct 29, 2013, at 10:24 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
>
> Hello happy people o/~
>
> November is getting closer and that means we should look into getting
> 4.1.0 out the door:
>
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS/fixforversion/12324891
>
> The following four (4) issues are currently un
Hi all,
I’d like to get some closure on the TS-1919 Jira issue. There have been
concerns raised about this patch, and I will try to explain the pros and the
cons of this patch. Note that this is committed on the v5.0.x branch (it’s an
incompatible change), and I really want to decide the future
On Nov 3, 2013, at 8:40 AM, 永豪 wrote:
> https://github.com/mingzym/trafficserver/commits/master
>
> I have a rework in that target, big changes in the last 2 commits, please
> help me take a look.
>
> due to the heavy linking crossing directory, it is ugly and big, but the
> basic idea is to
https://github.com/mingzym/trafficserver/commits/master
I have a rework in that target, big changes in the last 2 commits, please help
me take a look.
due to the heavy linking crossing directory, it is ugly and big, but the basic
idea is to split all the libs in it’s own directory and using .la
