On 09/04/2013, at 7:06 PM, Yunkai Zhang wrote:
> And I think, we are talking to TS-1805:)
yes we are ;)
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Yunkai Zhang wrote:
> Hi James:
>
> The attached patch is good for me, thanks for your review.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 4:58 AM, James Peach
And I think, we are talking to TS-1805:)
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Yunkai Zhang wrote:
> Hi James:
>
> The attached patch is good for me, thanks for your review.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 4:58 AM, James Peach wrote:
>
>> Hi Yunkai,
>>
>> Leif and I reviewed the TS-1801 changes today
Hi James:
The attached patch is good for me, thanks for your review.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 4:58 AM, James Peach wrote:
> Hi Yunkai,
>
> Leif and I reviewed the TS-1801 changes today. It looks good, though we
> have one suggestion in NodeStatEval(), where there seems to be a
> possibility tha
Hi Yunkai,
Leif and I reviewed the TS-1801 changes today. It looks good, though we have
one suggestion in NodeStatEval(), where there seems to be a possibility that
the result_type would not be set correctly. Do you think that the attached
patch is correct?
J
Hi,
We need to implement SSL Termination for forward (both transparent &
non-transparent) proxy.
How to do that?
Can an existing reverse-proxy SSL termination be used for that?
thank you
