[dev] [dmenu] Cache on start option?

2009-10-21 Thread Roger
bin folders before choosing their application. -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org

Re: [dev] [dmenu] Cache on start option?

2009-10-21 Thread Roger
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 16:00 -0400, Kris Maglione wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:35:26AM -0800, Roger wrote: > >1) Start DWM > >2) After start of DWM, execute DMenu -cache (to cache/scan all bin > >folders into $HOME/.dmenu). > >3) Somebody finally executes DMe

Re: [dev] [dmenu] Cache on start option?

2009-10-21 Thread Roger
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 23:24 +0200, frederic wrote: > > dmenu can read items from stdin. You may create the cache yourself with > e.g. "ls -1 -colors=never /bin >cache", then do "dmenu at the dmenu_run script for details. Bingo! I'll give it a try when I get a

Re: [dev] [off-topic] Vimprobable

2009-10-25 Thread Roger
diting mode. Don't really know if it's needed except to enter form data. Elinks is another fine example of a minimal CLI browser. I find having both Elinks & Dillo constantly open on my desktop still uses far less resources then Firefox and Opera. -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org

[dev] [st] Slow ST character typing on i686/pentium3 platforms]

2015-03-03 Thread Roger
omplain as DWM has been my favorite desktop for the past years, but did you notice st getting a bit large? ;-) Granted, XFT font rasterizing and color effects are somewhat needed. -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

[dev] Re: [st] Slow ST character typing on i686/pentium3 platforms]

2015-03-03 Thread Roger
>... getting "EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable)", while the pselect >call only handles EINTR errno condition? bah. Just read-up pselect and found EAGAIN a normal return, and likely shouldn't delay chars printing to the screen. -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

[dev] Re: [st] Slow ST character typing on i686/pentium3 platforms]

2015-03-03 Thread Roger
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 09:20:23PM -0500, Roger wrote: >>... getting "EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable)", while the pselect >>call only handles EINTR errno condition? > >bah. Just read-up pselect and found EAGAIN a normal return, and likely >sho

Re: [dev] [st] Slow ST character typing on i686/pentium3 platforms]

2015-03-04 Thread Roger
es of code within that area of the code, still without any effect. The long delay does appear to be occuring within that area though, within pselect and draw. -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

Re: [dev] [st] Slow ST character typing on i686/pentium3 platforms]

2015-03-04 Thread Roger
seconds to appear. Key repeat also significantly delays. But overall, this delay or slow typing bug is much better with "drawtimeout.tv_set=1". -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

Re: [dev] [st] Slow ST character typing on i686/pentium3 platforms]

2015-03-08 Thread Roger
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 09:10:40PM -0800, Ariel A wrote: > > >On March 3, 2015 5:21:04 PM PST, Roger wrote: >>ST appears to compile and run fine on 64 bit and 32 bit platorms, >>except on 32 >>bit (i686/pentium3), typing is extremely slow. > >Try adjusting

Re: [dev] [st] Slow ST character typing on i686/pentium3 platforms]

2015-03-08 Thread Roger
> On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 05:24:53PM +0100, Markus Teich wrote: >Roger wrote: >> Whomever coded these early versions, might be able to very easily locate the >> slowdown explicitly at this point. > >Heyho Roger, > >just use `git bisect` to locate the commit respo

Re: [dev] [st] Slow ST character typing on i686/pentium3 platforms]

2015-03-08 Thread Roger
> On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 05:24:53PM +0100, Markus Teich wrote: >Roger wrote: >> Whomever coded these early versions, might be able to very easily locate the >> slowdown explicitly at this point. > >Heyho Roger, > >just use `git bisect` to locate the commit responsib

Re: [dev] [st] Slow ST character typing on i686/pentium3 platforms]

2015-03-08 Thread Roger
solution to the stuttering problem. Reversing this patch against current Git doesn't improve the current stutter. Will continue reversing patches... :-/ -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

Re: [dev] sed breaks utf8 in [ ]

2015-03-30 Thread Roger
Maybe I now need to Internationalize the sound of my surname, because it sounds too ASCII? -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

Re: [dev] sed breaks utf8 in [ ]

2015-03-30 Thread Roger
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:32:01PM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote: >On 30 March 2015 at 22:28, Roger wrote: >> No need for funky apostrophe usage within the English language. > >We do however need to use English currency. ?? ain't ASCII. I would presume that was the ol

Re: [dev] sed breaks utf8 in [ ]

2015-03-30 Thread Roger
equires more processing. >Are you a troll? Slander? >Cheers > >FRIGN > >-- >FRIGN > -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

Re: [dev] sed breaks utf8 in [ ]

2015-03-30 Thread Roger
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:01:32PM -0700, Eric Pruitt wrote: >On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 06:57:55PM -0400, Roger wrote: >> >We do however need to use English currency. ?? ain't ASCII. >> >> I would presume that was the old deprecated cents sign which was appare

Re: [dev] sed breaks utf8 in [ ]

2015-03-31 Thread Roger
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 01:30:04AM +0200, FRIGN wrote: >On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 19:09:41 -0400 >Roger wrote: > >Hey Roger, > >> I thought non-ASCII characters required 16 bits within UTF-8, versus just 8 >> bits for ASCII. Therefore more memory. More memory

Re: [dev] sed breaks utf8 in [ ]

2015-03-31 Thread Roger
no where did I say I was omitting UTF-8 support from (my) applications. I merrily stated I omit using those extra characters on my own computers, by using POSIX/C locale. (ie. You'll notice some manufactured hardware using the FAT file system, breaks when trying to read su

Re: [dev] sed breaks utf8 in [ ]

2015-03-31 Thread Roger
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:17:48AM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote: >On 31 March 2015 at 00:13, Roger wrote: >> But anyways, think I made my point. > >You did: you only care for whatever encoding you personally need over >there in America. Most of us, however, are from

Re: [dev] sed breaks utf8 in [ ]

2015-04-02 Thread Roger
e US have no need for the >> European >> characters, etc. > >Yes, but there are billons of persons of comunicating in these >other languages, in fact the majority of the population of >the world. You're not completely understanding what has been stated here. I'd suggest re-reading the thread. -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

Re: [dev] [rocks] Alpine Linux

2015-04-06 Thread Roger
& /. Just haven't had the time (as usual) to track the issue down and submit patches or suggestions. :-/ And thank God, no resource hogging Python package manager, and just either sh/bash and C! (Or what I see so far!) Roger

Re: [dev] books that rock

2015-04-25 Thread Roger
d all three or four books at once in order to grasp a subject. Manual pages are good typically only for referencing or acquiring an initial understanding, or a working knowledge. -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

[dev] DWM Xinerama

2011-11-10 Thread Roger
erminal on Monitor0, instead of always having to move the mouse to the second display and using DMenu? -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

Re: [dev] DWM Xinerama

2011-11-10 Thread Roger
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:28:18PM +0200, Ruben Mikkonen wrote: > DISPLAY="display" program, if I recall correctly. > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Roger <[1]rogerx@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've just configured two monitors on one NVid

Re: [dev] DWM Xinerama

2011-11-10 Thread Roger
itor? (And likely full screen mode too as mplayer's -xinerama has null effect again, likely due to DWM precedence?) (Documenting to Gentoo Wiki's DWM page.) -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

Re: [dev] DWM Xinerama

2011-11-10 Thread Roger
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 06:07:38PM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote: >Hey, > >On 10/11/2011, Roger wrote: >> Seems DWM takes precedence over the mplayer's options concerning monitor >> placement. So using the dwm.h file is best for specifying monitor? > >dwm

Re: [dev] DWM Xinerama

2011-11-11 Thread Roger
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 09:43:57AM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote: >On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 08:54:11PM -0500, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote: >> On Thu, 10 Nov 2011, Roger wrote: >> >> >I'm using dwm-5.9. I'd love to get a dwm-.ebuild into Gentoo, >> >

Re: [dev] semicolons

2011-11-18 Thread Roger
f0'd code >- count lines >- count parenthesis >- count semicolons > >--pancake Statistically speaking, it might be best at this point to use a multitude of counting mechanisms, using both line counts and semicolon counts. Anything can be worked around one way or another. For reference, standard benchmark tools also never look at just "one thing". -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

[dev] dmenu's lsx binary naming conflicts with lrzsz!

2011-11-26 Thread Roger
he lsx binary? (In the meantime, I've opened up a bug on bugs.gentoo.org for this.) -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

Re: [dev] dmenu's lsx binary naming conflicts with lrzsz!

2011-11-26 Thread Roger
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 11:02:06PM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote: >Incidentally, minicom works absolutely fine without lrzsz. minicom has a runtime depend here (on Gentoo) for lrzsz -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

Re: [dev] dmenu's lsx binary naming conflicts with lrzsz!

2011-11-27 Thread Roger
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 02:44:23PM +, Connor Lane Smith wrote: >Hey, > >On 27 November 2011 03:45, Roger wrote: >> Over the past few weeks, I've noticed dmenu's lsx binary naming conflicts >> with >> lrzsz (http://www.ohse.de/uwe/software/lrzsz.html)

Re: [dev] dmenu's lsx binary naming conflicts with lrzsz!

2011-11-27 Thread Roger
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 11:44:45PM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote: >On 27 November 2011 23:13, Roger wrote: >> Very well.  I'm considering renaming lsx to dmenu_lsx and it looks like lsx's >> only occurance is within /usr/bin/dmenu_run?  Or is the name change goi

Re: [dev] dmenu's lsx binary naming conflicts with lrzsz!

2011-11-28 Thread Roger
;em. You should consider a new career being a stand-up programming comedian! You're absolutely killing me hear with your humor! ;-) -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

Re: [dev] dmenu's lsx binary naming conflicts with lrzsz!

2011-11-28 Thread Roger
lsx manually. (Matter of fact, I believe this fix is already in the latest Portage rsync tree as I type this, allowing users to finally use minicom & ckermit in tandem of dmenu. -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

Re: [dev] dmenu's lsx binary naming conflicts with lrzsz!

2011-11-28 Thread Roger
ctrl+\ then c and will disconnect from the remote device. However, I have issues with trying to manually disconnecting from the remote device when using picocom or GNU Screen. Yup, even ctrl+a+a then \ doesn't work. Granted, I do enjoy the smaller packages. I have ckermit i

[dev] DWM vs XFCE4 Memory Usage

2011-12-04 Thread Roger
Checking memory usage between XFCE4 and DWM, I find XFCE4 uses only ~30MB more then DWM. 100MB - DWM + Xorg 130MB - XFCE4 2x750 P3 w/ 1GB RAM (I'm going to gander, Xorg uses around 60-70MB, with 20-30MB for other resources. Man Xorg is a beast on memory!) -- Roger

Re: [dev] DWM vs XFCE4 Memory Usage

2011-12-05 Thread Roger
d are compiled and installed. I'll just bet, 7/8's of xorg deals with transparency eye candy (composite, etc)! -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

Re: [dev] DWM vs XFCE4 Memory Usage

2011-12-05 Thread Roger
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 10:24:16AM +0100, Sime Ramov wrote: >* Roger [2011-12-04 21:35-0900]: >> (I'm going to gander, Xorg uses around 60-70MB, with 20-30MB for other >> resources. Man Xorg is a beast on memory!) > >That's interesting, Xorg uses 28-30 MB

Re: [dev] DWM vs XFCE4 Memory Usage

2011-12-05 Thread Roger
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 06:19:56PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote: >Greetings. > >Roger wrote: >> >> Anyways, the man reason for posting was just to note the memory resource >> difference between DWM and XFCE4. I still prefer DWM over XFCE4 as I can >

Re: [dev] DWM vs XFCE4 Memory Usage

2011-12-05 Thread Roger
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 06:19:56PM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote: >Greetings. > >Roger wrote: >> >> Anyways, the man reason for posting was just to note the memory resource >> difference between DWM and XFCE4. I still prefer DWM over XFCE4 as I can >

Re: [dev] DWM vs XFCE4 Memory Usage

2011-12-05 Thread Roger
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 09:17:02PM +0100, markus schnalke wrote: >[2011-12-04 21:35] Roger >> Checking memory usage between XFCE4 and DWM, I find XFCE4 uses only ~30MB >> more then DWM. >> >> 100MB - DWM + Xorg >> 130MB - XFCE4 > >I'm a bit conf

Re: [dev] DWM vs XFCE4 Memory Usage

2011-12-05 Thread Roger
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 02:36:57PM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote: >On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Roger wrote: >> (... think hplip pulls it in, as well as anything written using QT.) > >fyi hplip only needs dbus for the scan-to-fax functionality. if you >don't need that