2014-12-27 17:26 GMT+01:00 Markus Teich :
> younix wrote:
>> There may be 4 till 6 people at the suckless assembly. I created an
>> assembly for us. If there are more people out there, just come, meet
>> and hack with us. If you want to stay longer please create an wiki
>> accout at the 31C3-Wik
2017-04-01 11:58 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poeterring :
> Hi,
> As some of you may know, there has been some discussion within the
> suckless project to bring in external talent to help improve the
> condition of the programs. As a result of this management discussion,
> the project has hired me, Lennart P
2012/11/26 Ciprian Dorin Craciun :
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Hugues Moretto-Viry
> wrote:
>> Just because I'm really curious, I'm searching minimal GNU/Linux
>> distributions with the following options:
>>
>> - x86_64 architecture
>> - minimal installation
>> - no default Desktop Environm
2012/12/17 Trans :
> I discovered stali today. I like the idea and have often wondered myself why
> static linking was so frond upon. I'd like to see this operating system get
> off the ground.
>
> To that end I was wondering if you have ever considered taking an existing
> source-based distributio
Hi,
I think removing the loading indicator (progress bar) at the bottom
could be a good idea.
The indicator serves two purposes:
1. It tells you how much of the page has been loaded.
This information is redundant because the same information can
be found in the window title.
2.
I've created a patch that implements what we have talked about.
I'm still very unsure about what characters we should use and how the
window title text should be formatted so if anyone has a better idea
please let me know or just make the changes before pushing it.
// Jens (jfu on irc)
0001-Rem
Disregard my previous patch. I just remember that I forgot one case
(when not using SSL).
I think this patch is more correct.
// Jens
2013/2/12 Jens Nyberg :
> I've created a patch that implements what we have talked about.
>
> I'm still very unsure about what characters we
2013/2/13 Chris Down :
> Care to give some examples of where git sucks more than hg? I've found it
> particularly un-sucky, but non-intuitive in places.
>
People who can not grasp git thinks it's bad, it's that simple. Irony
of it all is that it is actually a very simple design that is both
fast,
2013/2/17 Donald Allen :
> I'm running surf 0.6 on an x86_64 Arch Linux system. The new version
> seems to be an improvement overall (some problems with gmail are
> gone), but here are some issues I've noticed:
>
> 1. Attempting to play youtube videos frequently results in youtube
> reporting that
2013/2/17 Jens Nyberg :
> 2013/2/17 Donald Allen :
>> I'm running surf 0.6 on an x86_64 Arch Linux system. The new version
>> seems to be an improvement overall (some problems with gmail are
>> gone), but here are some issues I've noticed:
>>
>> 1. A
This patch increases the performance of st significantly by reducing
the number of calls to draw.
To compare the performance, open up a larger document in st and use
your arrow keys to scroll down. The difference in scrolling speed is
huge.
Also it feels a lot snappier to type because it doesnt r
2013/2/21 Jens Nyberg :
> This patch increases the performance of st significantly by reducing
> the number of calls to draw.
>
> To compare the performance, open up a larger document in st and use
> your arrow keys to scroll down. The difference in scrolling speed is
> huge.
&
I have never tried rio but if I were to design one today I would have a
simple synthetic filesystem that for each window multiplexes the
framebuffer which is basically how rio works I assume. For maximum
performance each instance would write its content directly to the
framebuffer in a linear fashi
Perhaps a stupid questio
Den 30 maj 2013 18:27 skrev "Kevin Foster" :
>
> Hello,
>
> I have recently been looking for a tiling WM and like dwm so far. I have
one problem I can't figure out. The default keybinds for next/previous
screen (using Mod1 and the comma and period keys), as well as the "sen
2013/5/30 Kevin Foster
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Jens Nyberg wrote:
>
>> Perhaps a stupid questio
>>
> Not a stupid question... unless you were referring to mine. Sorry, I
> goofed.
>
>> You do have two screens right? Can you see dwm on both of them?
2013/5/30 Kevin Foster
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Jens Nyberg wrote:
>
>> Perhaps a stupid questio
>>
> Not a stupid question... unless you were referring to mine. Sorry, I
> goofed.
>
>> You do have two screens right? Can you see dwm on both of them?
Hi,
I've included a patch that makes minor changes to md5 and sha1. Both
hashing functions are pretty similar but the code differed in a few places
so I cleaned them both up a bit.
Also I made some minor changes like moving the rol function to below the
definitions and also instead of *= 8 I did
Hehe and I almost thought about changing to (x & 0x3f) instead of (x % 64)
but decided to skip that one =)
The more you know!
2013/7/15 Andreas Krennmair
> * sin [2013-07-15 12:20]:
>
> I'd break this patch into multiple patches. The change from *= 8 to <<= 3
>> doesn't make sense. Maybe i
I changed the bitshifting back as suggested. It was just confusing.
Attached the new patch.
2013/7/15 Thorsten Glaser
> Andreas Krennmair dixit:
>
> > from a few years ago that explains in detail how clever compilers really
> are
> > with their optimizations:
> http://www.fefe.de/source-code-o
Have you found time to look at my patch David?
2013/7/18 sin
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 09:59:30AM -0400, Galos, David wrote:
> > >Added mdprint().
> >
> > > Update $(HDR) in Makefile to avoid build errors
> > > with sbase-box target.
> >
> > I have decided to apply this; the net change in code
20 matches
Mail list logo
