2013/2/13 Chris Down <ch...@chrisdown.name>: > Care to give some examples of where git sucks more than hg? I've found it > particularly un-sucky, but non-intuitive in places. >
People who can not grasp git thinks it's bad, it's that simple. Irony of it all is that it is actually a very simple design that is both fast, reliable and annoyingly easy to work with. Sure we could cope without all that syntactic sugar (a suckless frontend anyone?) but that is not the fault in design but simply the tools which has way to much options in order to please everyone and their mother. > On 13 February 2013 07:28, Sam Watkins <s...@nipl.net> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:25:18AM +0100, Christoph Lohmann wrote: >> > I am proposing a migration of all mercurial to git repositories. >> >> I've been working with git lately, trying to do some unusual things, >> and I need to say this is one of the least suckless pieces of software >> I've ever worked with. It's complex, obscure, inconsistent, quirky... >> >> You migrated from hg to git, because *git* sucks less??? Say WHAT?! >> >
