* Joshua Shoemaker [2011-06-28 20:50]:
Just playing around with surf. So far I like it and think it will work.
However, I noticed when I try to resize the height of a input button it
doesn't display correctly. Tested it on two different systems/OSs with
same result. Not sure if this is a
* Silvan Jegen [2014-03-04 14:30]:
* There are no generics (it is not clear at the moment whether they
will be incorporated into the language in the future) but with my
simple requirements I have not been missing them.
They will be incorporated as soon as someone finds a good solution to this
* mikshaw [2011-10-23 14:50]:
Claiming a person's freedoms are decided by their ability to obtain those
freedoms? Very wrong. Just as laws against slavery are there to balance the
freedoms of all, GPL is there to balance the freedoms of all users & devs,
present and future.
Primarily, the
* Martin Kopta [2011-10-29 17:40]:
http://newsbeuter.org/
Not really suckless, but close enough. Also, TUI.
newsbeuter is indeed far from suckless, but at least it's one of the few
RSS/Atom parser implementation that doesn't take parsing lightly. Many RSS
feeds in the real world are seriousl
* Bjartur Thorlacius [2011-11-02 16:00]:
* hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> [2011-11-02 10:11]:
> > I once envisioned a Plugin to directly go to "Print Views" of
> > websites,
> > since they tend to have considerably less suck on them.
>
I used to use mobile version of some websites, but as handhel
* Kurt H Maier [2011-11-02 16:40]:
web idiots have been spouting such bullshit since the 'graceful
degradation' days of html4. it's never come true, and it never will,
because the "standards" put forth are anything but. what you are
talking about is the web version of "the check is in the mail
* Stephen Paul Weber [2012-09-19 17:00]:
Still, forking is never the bottleneck
Never? Isn't forking-as-bottleneck most of the reason alternatives to
CGI exist?
One of the bottlenecks of CGI is that the popular "web scripting" languages
(i.e. PHP, Perl, Python, Ruby) make it horribly inef
* Christophe-Marie Duquesne [2012-09-21 16:00]:
Why not zeromq? It seems to be light, simple and performant. It also
has extended documentation, and a large community to support it.
Allegedly, zeromq puts speed before reliability. Who would really want to use
that?
Regards,
Andreas
Hello everyone,
Yesterday, out of frustration and boredom, I started a minimalistic
implementation of tar in Go which I named rat ('tar' reversed, but also
'ridiculously abysmal tar'). Today, I reached a point where I can show that
piece of software to you.
It currently supports the tar oper
* Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> [2012-11-06 16:20]:
On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:10:33 +0100 Andreas Krennmair wrote:
Hello everyone,
Yesterday, out of frustration and boredom, I started a minimalistic
implementation of tar in Go which I named rat ('tar' reversed, but also
'
* pancake [2012-11-26 18:00]:
On 11/26/12 17:33, Kurt H Maier wrote:
programming languages, and pretending it's 'simple' because it's broken
sloccount
git = 126.000 C
libgit2 = 37.000
mercurial = 34.000 python + 3000 in C
if you say that python loc is 2x times the same done in C then we
sho
* Christian Neukirchen [2012-11-26 20:30]:
Andreas Krennmair writes:
* pancake [2012-11-26 18:00]:
On 11/26/12 17:33, Kurt H Maier wrote:
programming languages, and pretending it's 'simple' because it's broken
sloccount
git = 126.000 C
libgit2 = 37.000
mercurial =
* Patrick Haller <201009-suckl...@haller.ws> [2013-04-11 04:30]:
On 2013-04-10 13:13, William Giokas wrote:
There are extremely strong technical arguments for using systemd as a
simple, easy to use and easy to configure initialization system.
systemd trades simplicity for boot-speed and stack
* Thorsten Glaser [2013-05-22 22:29]:
AFAIK they mandate that XHTML be served as application/xml+xhtml
instead of text/html, which the XHTML standard itself says
to use for compatibility reasons (they also try to weasel
in the application/xml+xhtml content type, but realise it
won’t work). Nice
* sin [2013-07-15 12:20]:
I'd break this patch into multiple patches. The change from *= 8 to <<= 3
doesn't make sense. Maybe it did in the 80s but not anymore.
Just for the sake of completeness: there's a rather interesting presentation
from a few years ago that explains in detail how clev
* Alexander Huemer [2013-11-04 15:30]:
The only interface to the kernels the suckless.org software runs on is
in C, the same is true for the standard librar{y,ies}. Software written
in any other language is an indirection.
The system call interfaces on typical suckless operating systems are
l
* Sylvain BERTRAND [2013-11-04 19:00]:
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 06:41:25PM +0100, Andreas Krennmair wrote:
* Alexander Huemer [2013-11-04 15:30]:
>The only interface to the kernels the suckless.org software runs on is
>in C, the same is true for the standard librar{y,ies}. Software writt
17 matches
Mail list logo
