Re: [dev] New Suckless computer language?

2016-07-24 Thread lukáš Hozda
> and rust compiler/sdk has similar issues Rust does have an unfinished GCC front-end by Phillip Herron, but the main compiler, Rustc, is written in Rust, where in the repo there is a binary of the last version, which compiles the current version and the new binary compiles itself again and only t

Re: [dev] New Suckless computer language?

2016-07-24 Thread Daniel V
2016-07-24 1:26 GMT+02:00, hiro <23h...@gmail.com>: > small languages are useful, as a language in the language. > > One of the possibilities is to use the to compile byte code, and run that code in a VM, integrated in your program written in C. Quite easy as there is not much to learn. Or you ca

Re: [dev] new pre-patched version of dwm available

2016-07-24 Thread Jan Christoph Ebersbach
Hi, I also keep a patched version of dwm at github.com/jceb/dwm-patches that stacks all the patches in order to smoothly apply them. This is also how I develop my patch using quilt. Unfortunately, it's extremely hard to port interwoven patches back to mainline. I have some tooling at github.com

Re: [dev][patch] Proper window type for dwm and dmenu

2016-07-24 Thread Jan Christoph Ebersbach
Hi, Here are the patches to set _NET_WM_WINDOW_TYPE_DOCK for dwm's bar and dmenu. Would someone with commit rights apply them to master? Thank you. Jan Christoph On Wed 20-07-2016 07:05 +0200, Jan Christoph Ebersbach wrote: > Great, thanks for the feeback. I'll provide a patch this week. > >

Re: [dev] New Suckless computer language?

2016-07-24 Thread hiro
tldr, can you stop doing these sales pitches please?

Re: [dev] new pre-patched version of dwm available

2016-07-24 Thread hiro
perhaps you want too many stupid things.

Re: [dev][patch] Proper window type for dwm and dmenu

2016-07-24 Thread hiro
hahahahaha. shadows.

Re: [dev][patch] Proper window type for dwm and dmenu

2016-07-24 Thread Staven
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 11:10:48PM +0200, hiro wrote: > hahahahaha. shadows. > They're useful for vampire detection.

Re: [dev] new pre-patched version of dwm available

2016-07-24 Thread Ben Woolley
I think it is natural for related changes to be consolidated over time. Think of punctuated equilibrium. Maybe after it is clear that some patches just go well together, fitting a related niche, they could be consolidated to make maintenance easier. > On Jul 24, 2016, at 12:51 PM, Jan Christo

Re: [dev] new pre-patched version of dwm available

2016-07-24 Thread Ben Woolley
I think Jan provided insight through experience. That is basically the opposite of stupid. > On Jul 24, 2016, at 2:09 PM, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote: > > perhaps you want too many stupid things. >

Re: [dev][patch] Proper window type for dwm and dmenu

2016-07-24 Thread Ben Woolley
Don't be discouraged by the other replies. I have been caught off guard by a dmenu of my own use being a bit too subtle for me to notice, and a shadow would have made it more clear that a new object needs attention. Not sure why anyone would complain about a UI advancement that is both trivial a

Re: [dev] new pre-patched version of dwm available

2016-07-24 Thread Eric Pruitt
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 05:21:42PM +0200, FRIGN wrote: > It's a difficult matter because patches interfere. I know of no way to > make multiple patches inclusive to each other, in many cases it is not > possible. Something I do with my patches to make them easier manually edit the resulting diffs