I think it is natural for related changes to be consolidated over time. Think 
of punctuated equilibrium. 

Maybe after it is clear that some patches just go well together, fitting a 
related niche, they could be consolidated to make maintenance easier. 

> On Jul 24, 2016, at 12:51 PM, Jan Christoph Ebersbach <j...@e-jc.de> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I also keep a patched version of dwm at github.com/jceb/dwm-patches that
> stacks all the patches in order to smoothly apply them.  This is also
> how I develop my patch using quilt.
> 
> Unfortunately, it's extremely hard to port interwoven patches back to
> mainline.  I have some tooling at github.com/jceb/dwm-clean-patches that
> reduces the pain to the bare minimum but even this is a lot of pain and
> time.
> 
> Personally, I'd recommend newbies that want to use a patched version to
> find someone who's maintaining a "fork".  Maybe these "forks" could be
> listed in the patches section of the wiki.  What do you think?
> 
> Jan Christoph
> 
> PS: I'll update my share of patches in the next 1-2 weeks to the current
> HEAD.
> 
>> On Sat 23-07-2016 17:21 +0200, FRIGN wrote:
>> 
>> On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 13:54:36 -0800 Britton Kerin
>> <britton.ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hey Britton,
>> 
>>> dwm needs patches to be good but the patches area is a mess and I
>>> couln't get along with devs about fixing it, so I thought a
>>> pre-rolled version of dwm might be useful instead:
>> 
>> you really raise a valid point, fortunately, as you may know, there
>> are proceedings to clean up the wiki and the progress is already
>> pretty good.  It's a difficult matter because patches interfere. I
>> know of no way to make multiple patches inclusive to each other, in
>> many cases it is not possible.  There are some things thought that I'd
>> like to see in mainline, e.g.  removing borders of the window when
>> there's only one window in the current tag.
>> 
>> Cheers
>> 
>> FRIGN
> 
> --
> Jan Christoph Ebersbach
> I didn’t want some petty, inferior brand of righteousness that comes
> from keeping a list of rules when I could get the robust kind that comes
> from trusting Christ - God’s righteousness.  Phil 3:9

Reply via email to