Dnia 9 listopada 2015 0:45 Hiltjo Posthuma napisał(a):
> After a long time (dwm 6.0 was released on 2011-12-19) it is time for a new
> dwm release.
I'm grateful for maintaining this software, however my upgrade from 6.0->1
brought me nothing but grumpiness unfortunately.
It has xft that I don
I also have problems with 6.1; it won't compile because of a lack of xft
fonts on my machine, or, I think that's my problem.
I appreciate that DWM is a developer's tool and, in using it I should
have sufficient knowledge to address this issue, but..
I do like DWM and I'd would like to continu
On Mon, 07 Dec 2015 15:25:05 +0100
Jakub Lach wrote:
Hey Jakub,
> I'm grateful for maintaining this software, however my upgrade from 6.0->1
> brought me nothing but grumpiness unfortunately.
> It has xft that I don't want, my terminus font doesn't work (or I haven't
> figured the syntax), ha
Hello,
For xft Terminus, I simply use "Terminus:bold:size=9", that
seems to work best, you should check "fc-list | grep Terminus"
to see if Terminus is in fontconfig fontpath (or whatever its called)
or else add it, like so "xset +fp ~/.fonts/terminus" or where ever
you have yours, with .xinitrc
On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 16:14:10 +0100
"G.H." wrote:
> I also have problems with 6.1; it won't compile because of a lack of xft
> fonts on my machine, or, I think that's my problem.
Huh? What OS/distro are you guys using that you don't already have
libxft? I have so many packages that rely on it.
Dnia 7 grudnia 2015 16:16 FRIGN napisał(a):
> ...
Yeah, thanks. I'm aware of differences, I've rewrote
config.h, I've anticipated such response and I'm
(partially) okay with it. I've reverted to 6.0 too.
What I'm trying to say, is that 6.1 is a little more
POLA violating, than dwm releases us
On 7 December 2015 at 15:51, Jakub Lach wrote:
> What I'm trying to say, is that 6.1 is a little more
> POLA violating, than dwm releases used to be.
I do think it a little unfortunate that dwm release numbering means
essentially nothing. The jump from 6.0 to 6.1 was far greater than 5.9
to 6.0 w
Hey there,
2015-12-07 16:51 GMT+01:00, Matthew of Boswell
:
> Huh? What OS/distro are you guys using that you don't already have
> libxft? I have so many packages that rely on it.
Mainstream Linux distros fought with all their might against gcc to fit
their OS into the CD-ROM boundaries.
The funn
On Mon, 07 Dec 2015 16:51:55 +0100
Jakub Lach wrote:
> [...]than dwm releases used to be.
I'm curious now... how long have you been using dwm? The last release
before this was in 2011.
--
Matt Boswell
Dnia 7 grudnia 2015 17:15 Matthew of Boswell
napisał(a):
> On Mon, 07 Dec 2015 16:51:55 +0100
> Jakub Lach wrote:
> > [...]than dwm releases used to be.
>
> I'm curious now... how long have you been using dwm? The last release
> before this was in 2011.
About 2008 I think.
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 03:25:05PM +0100, Jakub Lach wrote:
> It has xft that I don't want, my terminus font doesn't work (or I haven't
> figured the syntax), had to rewrite config.h
Your terminus font settings might not work out-of-the-box, but now
everyone that wants to use dwm with languages th
11 matches
Mail list logo
