On 7 December 2015 at 15:51, Jakub Lach <jakub_l...@mailplus.pl> wrote: > What I'm trying to say, is that 6.1 is a little more > POLA violating, than dwm releases used to be.
I do think it a little unfortunate that dwm release numbering means essentially nothing. The jump from 6.0 to 6.1 was far greater than 5.9 to 6.0 was, which is surprising given that most software uses major-minor versioning. cls
