On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Ivan Delalande wrote:
> Commit 5edeec1 introduced a wrong factor for nanosecond computation, the
> correct
> value is 1E6. Time and timeout values are 10 times less than they should be
> and
> this cause high CPU usage.
>
> Reported by pyroh on IRC. Thanks!
Nice
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> I heard about GNU GPL version wars, was only aware of the benign
> Linus T. one.
>
> Let me laught:
> Do you really think a GNU GPL version war can reasonnably
> compensate the defect of code closing from MIT/BSD-like licenses.
> I'm not w
> Careful, all the previous cases will fall through.
Upss, stupid fail. I will redone the patch serie. Thanks!
--
Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
> Commit 5edeec1 introduced a wrong factor for nanosecond computation, the
> correct
> value is 1E6. Time and timeout values are 10 times less than they should be
> and
> this cause high CPU usage.
Applied!!!, thanks.
--
Roberto E. Vargas Caballero
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:14:11 +0200
Silvan Jegen wrote:
> Nice!
>
> I can confirm that this patch makes a big difference on the VM I use
> at work. Even typing in st is slow without this patch applied.
Sorry for not noticing this! I assumed (10E6 == 10^6). I'm sure this
won't happen again ;)
Ch
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 12:49 PM, FRIGN wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:14:11 +0200
> Silvan Jegen wrote:
>
>> Nice!
>>
>> I can confirm that this patch makes a big difference on the VM I use
>> at work. Even typing in st is slow without this patch applied.
>
> Sorry for not noticing this! I assu
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 05:30:04 +0200
Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> Well, I disagree on that point with Kernighan & Pike (The Unix
> Programming Environment, pg. 241).
Why do you disagree?
And before you go open a new thread, don't do it! A response is
sufficient.
I consider this book the UNIX bible
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:58:34 +0200
Silvan Jegen wrote:
> That's ok, bugs happen (and I did not see it when the patch was sent either).
>
> I only noticed when I tested the patch that fixed the issue (because I
> was running a version without the problematic commit. Otherwise I
> would have compl
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:35:39PM -0600, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
> Sylvain BERTRAND writes:
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 09:32:33PM -0600, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
> > > Sylvain BERTRAND writes:
> > >> I firmely disagree with you on this: the event of somebody hurt
> > >> by the GNU GPL with rea
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 01:04:09PM +0200, FRIGN wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 05:30:04 +0200
> Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
>
> > Well, I disagree on that point with Kernighan & Pike (The Unix
> > Programming Environment, pg. 241).
>
> Why do you disagree?
>
> And before you go open a new thread, do
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 05:57:13PM +0900, Philip Rushik wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote:
> > I heard about GNU GPL version wars, was only aware of the benign
> > Linus T. one.
> >
> > Let me laught:
> > Do you really think a GNU GPL version war can reasonnably
> >
Hi Sylvain!
You must be new here. People on this list mainly lurk watching progress
of suckless software. There are two kinds of threads here:
1. Patches and development of suckless software - strictly technical.
2. The rest - recommendations/questions for/about suckless
software/distros/protocols
Hadrian,
please do not tell that you represent everyone, you don't. Also what you
just said is like your opinion, man.
13 matches
Mail list logo
